- Configured action once per minute "Automatically distribute employees' business processes to other employees"
In which 4 statuses are selected, in which the order is not confirmed.
Go to the process https://rivcont.info/2336291/
The manager Nastya confirmed the order and Nastya was chosen as the responsible person at the confirmation stage
Next, we see [file]10139[/file] that the responsible person was changed, as far as I understand by this action, but the process status no longer falls under the action settings
Why did it happen so ? look
- Configured action once per minute "Automatically distribute employees' business processes to other employees" In which 4 statuses are selected, in which the order is not confirmed. Go to the process https://rivcont.info/2336291/ The manager Nastya confirmed the order and Nastya was chosen as the responsible person at the confirmation stage Next, we see that the responsible person was changed, as far as I understand by this action, but the process status no longer falls under the action settings Why did it happen so ? look
Tyndyk Maxim Vadimovich OneBox production Administrator wrote: Is this an isolated case? This could happen when the cron took the process into processing and in parallel it was already changed.
Yes, only one case so far. But, the problem should not be repeated, because the salary of managers depends on this parameter
[quote]
Tyndyk Maxim Vadimovich
OneBox production
Administrator wrote:
Is this an isolated case?
This could happen when the cron took the process into processing and in parallel it was already changed.
[/quote]
Yes, only one case so far.
But, the problem should not be repeated, because the salary of managers depends on this parameter
But, the problem should not be repeated, because the salary of managers depends on this parameter
I will not influence this, this can happen due to the parallelism of the processes.
[quote]
But, the problem should not be repeated, because the salary of managers depends on this parameter
[/quote]
I will not influence this, this can happen due to the parallelism of the processes.
Tyndyk Maxim Vadimovich OneBox production Administrator wrote:
But, the problem should not be repeated, because the salary of managers depends on this parameter
I will not influence this, this can happen due to the parallelism of the processes.
Okay, if I repeat myself, I will send an example in order to understand exactly what the problem is Maybe we'll come up with something
[quote]
Tyndyk Maxim Vadimovich
OneBox production
Administrator wrote:
[quote]
But, the problem should not be repeated, because the salary of managers depends on this parameter
[/quote]
I will not influence this, this can happen due to the parallelism of the processes.
[/quote]
Okay, if I repeat myself, I will send an example in order to understand exactly what the problem is
Maybe we'll come up with something
Please join the conversation. If you have something to say - please write a comment. You will need a mobile phone and an SMS code for identification to enter.
Log in and comment
Donate
You don't have enough funds in your account Top up