OS - Synchronization of comments only visible to the client
2021-07-21 15:47:13
We are testing the work of Onebox Network, in particular, the synchronization of processes.
Now I see the moment that all comments get into the client's box or vice versa.
Both with and without eyes. - here is an example from my side https://nextgenos.crm-onebox.com/6/
And here's what the comments look like from the sender's side (attached a screen).
Can I add a setting either within the Application or within the BP - so that only comments "Available for viewing in the personal account" are transmitted?
Original question is available on version: ru
Now I see the moment that all comments get into the client's box or vice versa.
Both with and without eyes. - here is an example from my side https://nextgenos.crm-onebox.com/6/
And here's what the comments look like from the sender's side (attached a screen).
Can I add a setting either within the Application or within the BP - so that only comments "Available for viewing in the personal account" are transmitted?
Answers:
As use cases - I will give an example based on TP:
1. If you need to connect a manager or a more expert specialist to the task and unsubscribe some comment that the client does not need to see
2. Some of our guys leave the process code as a comment - with a task-consultation, a bug, refinement, in order to quickly navigate in a bunch of tasks - also a moment that is not necessary for the client to see
1. If you need to connect a manager or a more expert specialist to the task and unsubscribe some comment that the client does not need to see
2. Some of our guys leave the process code as a comment - with a task-consultation, a bug, refinement, in order to quickly navigate in a bunch of tasks - also a moment that is not necessary for the client to see
21.07.2021, 17:35
Original comment available on version: ru
Well, those are the arguments...
it is not clear why not create a subprocess and work in it in this case
it is not clear why not create a subprocess and work in it in this case
23.07.2021, 17:15
Original comment available on version: ru
Ustimenko Igor
OneBox production wrote:
it is not clear why not create a subprocess and work in it in this case
Information that is needed in the task from the client, so that it is easier to navigate, what from where and where to keep in subprocesses?
Well, that's the same idea...
23.07.2021, 17:41
Original comment available on version: ru
Bushuev Svyatoslav Yurievich
SheBo wrote:
Ustimenko Igor
OneBox production wrote:
it is not clear why not create a subprocess and work in it in this case
Information that is needed in the task from the client, so that it is easier to navigate, what from where and where to keep in subprocesses?
Well, that's the same idea...
we will move away from the current LC, I think
well, I don’t see the value in these dopils for free, I’m not ready to do
15.08.2021, 20:10
Original comment available on version: ru
Please join the conversation. If you have something to say - please write a comment. You will need a mobile phone and an SMS code for identification to enter.
Log in and comment
Copyright © OneBox 2024
