Incorrectly shows the amount paid in the list of orders

[quote] Kupriyan Vladislav Valerievich wrote: Why does it show incorrectly (should show paid amount less than order amount) ? [/quote] Is there a sequence of actions so that this can be repeated? I would try to find and fix the problem If not, you can recalculate orders paid

This happens regularly but new orders Here are the new orders https://baza.cn.ua/admin/customorder/order/?filtercustomlikpeyliqpay14=1&filtershowprocess=&filterdelivery=&filtercustomoplatacherez4=&filtercdatefrom=2020-12-10+00%3A00&filtercdateto=&filterdatetofrom=&filterdatetoto=&filterdeliverynote=&filterumber=&filtername= &filterproductid=&filterproductname=&filterclientid[0]=&filterauthorid=&filtermanagerid=&workflowid[0]=12&statusid[0]=67&statusid[1]=134&statusid[2]=146&statusid[3]=69&statusid[4]=77&statusid[5]=103&statusid[ 6]=115&statusid[7]=116&statusid[8]=117&statusid[9]=118&statusid[10]=119&statusid[11]=78&statusid[12]=140&statusid[13]=142&statusid[14]=144&filterdeletedid=&filternovaposhtastatus=&filtersumfrom=&filtersumto =&filtercode1c=&filterintervalfrom=&filterintervalto=&ok=1&searchLine= All new with problems Now I will describe the logic of how everything works and maybe you will understand where the problem is I have 2 wallets, one wallet is linked to legal entity1, the second one is linked to legal entity2 One legal entity virtual Synchronization with private is configured When a payment is received on a private account, the system first looks for a task (which comes to the mail and is parsed) After the task was found, a payment was tied to it Further, when the payment is tied, an order is searched And when the order is found, it binds the task to the order (to which the payment of wallet No. 1 is attached) through the parent After binding, we transfer the order to the status on which the action of adding a payment to wallet No. 2 is triggered And after that we untie the task from the order (that would not sum up the amount of payments for the order) And it turns out that they untied but the amount was not recalculated When I enter the order in the finance tab https://baza.cn.ua/admin/customorder/order/30245/payment/ Then the system recalculates this amount That is, you need to fix it so that at the time of decoupling this field is recalculated, well, maybe something else Here is the procedure for binding and unbinding from a parent https://baza.cn.ua/admin/shop/workflow/7/procedure/119/?status=0 [file]1777[/file]

[quote] Kupriyan Vladislav Valerievich wrote: And after that we untie the task from the order (that would not sum up the amount of payments for the order) And it turns out that they untied but the amount was not recalculated That is, you need to fix it so that at the time of decoupling this field is recalculated, well, maybe something else Here is the procedure for binding and unbinding from a parent https://baza.cn.ua/admin/shop/workflow/7/procedure/119/?status=0 [/quote] Yeah, it turns out that in your parent you counted paid, taking into account the subprocess, and then when the last action on the procedure removes the parent - do you need to recalculate? I'll see

[quote] Tyndyk Maxim Vadimovich Administrator wrote: [quote] Kupriyan Vladislav Valerievich wrote: And after that we untie the task from the order (that would not sum up the amount of payments for the order) And it turns out that they untied but the amount was not recalculated That is, you need to fix it so that at the time of decoupling this field is recalculated, well, maybe something else Here is the procedure for binding and unbinding from a parent https://baza.cn.ua/admin/shop/workflow/7/procedure/119/?status=0 [/quote] Yeah, it turns out that in your parent you counted paid, taking into account the subprocess, and then when the last action on the procedure removes the parent - do you need to recalculate? I'll see [/quote] Yes

Well duck wait - assigning a parent does not recalculate the amount paid. It is recalculated when adding a payment in the process where it was added. Have you accidentally added this payment to a child process with the action "Distribute payments among processes based on expected payments"?

[quote] Tyndyk Maxim Vadimovich Administrator wrote: Well duck wait - assigning a parent does not recalculate the amount paid. It is recalculated when adding a payment in the process where it was added. Have you accidentally added this payment to a child process with the action "Distribute payments among processes based on expected payments"? [/quote] No, not by this action I described the procedure for adding payments above That is, the payment was first attached to the task, then the task was attached to the order, then the payment was added to the order by the action (and at that moment the amount doubled), and then the task is unlinked from the order, and at this moment the amount of payments should have been calculated , since it is formed on the basis of payments for all subtasks

[quote] Kupriyan Vladislav Valerievich wrote: further in the order, the action added a payment (and at this moment the amount doubled) [/quote] Well, if there was a payment both in the order and in the child task - and it is not indicated that only the current process's payments are considered as paid - everything was calculated correctly. [quote] Kupriyan Vladislav Valerievich wrote: and then there is already a decoupling of the task from the order, and at this moment the amount of payments should have been calculated, since it is then formed on the basis of payments for all subtasks [/quote] should not, if there was no editing of the payment in the parent or the parent itself

[quote] Tyndyk Maxim Vadimovich Administrator wrote: and it is not indicated what to consider only the current process payments in paid [/quote] Where is such a setting? [quote] Tyndyk Maxim Vadimovich Administrator wrote: should not, if there was no editing of the payment in the parent or the parent itself [/quote] And where is the logic then if I look at the list of orders and an order comes out for the amount of 81.00 paid costs 158.44 I go into payments and see there only payment for 79.22 I also go into the order itself and there it shows https://prnt.sc/ in the paid field w2kn8e That is, the field in the order shows correctly, but the field in the list of orders does not Is it right?

[quote] Kupriyan Vladislav Valerievich Baza.cn.ua / Integrator (FOP Kupriyan) wrote: And where is the logic then if I look at the list of orders and an order comes out for the amount of 81.00 paid costs 158.44 I go into payments and see there only payment for 79.22 I also go into the order itself and there it shows https://prnt.sc/ in the paid field w2kn8e That is, the field in the order shows correctly, but the field in the list of orders does not Is it right? [/quote] ?