Good day!
The same supplier is duplicated after loading the supplier's price.
For example, there is a product for which the supplier is already specified and the supplier code is there.
After downloading the price of this supplier, where the identifier is the supplier code https://prnt.sc/3gQiigOe4MR_ - the product identifies, but! a separate term with the same supplier is added.
this is what it looks like https://prnt.sc/ggeNATuYY4YM
Another example with another provider is https://prnt.sc/3YFPc4_2dWVC
Because of this, some product settings do not work
Maybe someone has already faced this? What could be the reason for such duplication?
Good day! The same supplier is duplicated after loading the supplier's price. For example, there is a product for which the supplier is already specified and the supplier code is there. After downloading the price of this supplier, where the identifier is the supplier code https://prnt.sc/3gQiigOe4MR_ - the product identifies, but! a separate term with the same supplier is added. this is what it looks like https://prnt.sc/ggeNATuYY4YM Another example with another provider is https://prnt.sc/3YFPc4_2dWVC Because of this, some product settings do not work Maybe someone has already faced this? What could be the reason for such duplication?
Probably in other application settings you have enabled the setting "Allow binding of several items from one supplier to a product". Do you need it? If so, why? When this setting is enabled, there may be multiple records for one product from one supplier if they were searched for by different fields (one by supplier code, for example, the second was found by article number, etc.)
Probably in other application settings you have enabled the setting "Allow binding of several items from one supplier to a product". Do you need it? If so, why?
When this setting is enabled, there may be multiple records for one product from one supplier if they were searched for by different fields (one by supplier code, for example, the second was found by article number, etc.)
There was this checkmark because I didn't even know about the existence of these settings) Took it off, tested it - it doesn't duplicate! ))) Thank you :)))
There was this checkmark because I didn't even know about the existence of these settings)
Took it off, tested it - it doesn't duplicate! )))
Thank you :)))
Please join the conversation. If you have something to say - please write a comment. You will need a mobile phone and an SMS code for identification to enter.
Log in and comment
Donate
You don't have enough funds in your account Top up