Report https://crm.hlr.ua:50443/admin/report/designer/14/
Settings sorting by field Client1s [file]16911[/file]
result https://crm.hlr.ua:50443/admin/report/desiner/14/view/?order_filtercustomproverkaprosrochenoos477=1&filter_order_cdatetype=now&filter_order_cdateperiod=year&filter_order_dateplanfrom=&filter_order_dateplanto=2022-08-15&templateid=&ok=%D0%A4%D0%B8 %D0%BB%D1%8C%D1%82%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%8C
[file]16912[/file] not in alphabetical order
Please correct
Da Hong Pao OneBox production wrote: You have a field with the "Contact Directory" type, they are sorted not by full name but by record id, i.e. by client id.
I see, sorry. You need sorting by responsible or by the above field, both contact directory(
[quote]
Da Hong Pao
OneBox production wrote:
You have a field with the "Contact Directory" type, they are sorted not by full name but by record id, i.e. by client id.
[/quote]
I see, sorry. You need sorting by responsible or by the above field, both contact directory(
If you need to sort as text, you can create another additional field with the Text type, copy the name you need there and sort it as text and not as a number (contact id)
If you need to sort as text, you can create another additional field with the Text type, copy the name you need there and sort it as text and not as a number (contact id)
Da Hong Pao OneBox production wrote: If you need to sort as text, you can create another additional field with the Text type, copy the name you need there and sort it as text and not as a number (contact id)
it will interfere with the interface of the process. Or maybe I can not display to the user the field by which I sort?
[quote]
Da Hong Pao
OneBox production wrote:
If you need to sort as text, you can create another additional field with the Text type, copy the name you need there and sort it as text and not as a number (contact id)
[/quote]
it will interfere with the interface of the process. Or maybe I can not display to the user the field by which I sort?
Da Hong Pao OneBox production wrote: If you need to sort as text, you can create another additional field with the Text type, copy the name you need there and sort it as text and not as a number (contact id)
it will interfere with the interface of the process. Or maybe I can not display to the user the field by which I sort?
Well, try to put down 1 2 3 in any additional field of 3 processes and sort without output, this seems to be easily checked.
[quote]
Shatokhina Irina wrote:
[quote]
Da Hong Pao
OneBox production wrote:
If you need to sort as text, you can create another additional field with the Text type, copy the name you need there and sort it as text and not as a number (contact id)
[/quote]
it will interfere with the interface of the process. Or maybe I can not display to the user the field by which I sort?
[/quote]
Well, try to put down 1 2 3 in any additional field of 3 processes and sort without output, this seems to be easily checked.
Da Hong Pao OneBox production wrote: If you need to sort as text, you can create another additional field with the Text type, copy the name you need there and sort it as text and not as a number (contact id)
it will interfere with the interface of the process. Or maybe I can not display to the user the field by which I sort?
Well, try to put down 1 2 3 in any additional field of 3 processes and sort without output, this seems to be easily checked.
I hoped that I would not have to check) thanks
[quote]
Da Hong Pao
OneBox production wrote:
[quote]
Shatokhina Irina wrote:
[quote]
Da Hong Pao
OneBox production wrote:
If you need to sort as text, you can create another additional field with the Text type, copy the name you need there and sort it as text and not as a number (contact id)
[/quote]
it will interfere with the interface of the process. Or maybe I can not display to the user the field by which I sort?
[/quote]
Well, try to put down 1 2 3 in any additional field of 3 processes and sort without output, this seems to be easily checked.
[/quote]
I hoped that I would not have to check) thanks
well, I don't think it's worth abusing the time of answering a question if you can check some feature yourself. You yourself take away this time, since your other question may not be answered.
well, I don't think it's worth abusing the time of answering a question if you can check some feature yourself. You yourself take away this time, since your other question may not be answered.
Please join the conversation. If you have something to say - please write a comment. You will need a mobile phone and an SMS code for identification to enter.
Log in and comment
Donate
You don't have enough funds in your account Top up