Julia, good afternoon!
I'll try to answer some of your questions. Maybe a couple of comments.
I'll start with the first pain "why is there such poor technical support in OneBox".
But it simply does not exist, and this is part of the agreement with users.
Let me explain:
OneBox has no technical support, none at all. There is only a forum where everyone can help each other. The OneBox company itself charges money to partners if they help customers on the forum. This stimulates responses in the forum.
Why is everything the way it is and why do I consider this agreement acceptable and competitive in the market. If you omit all legal issues, then the key business of OneBox is:
- or providing software for rent as is (cloud, rent)
- or sale of the right to use software on their servers (box, sale of activation keys or licenses).
Anything else is not a OneBox business and doesn't make money (at all).
In other words, we directly tell all clients:
dear client, for 25 USD/month you get software, for the development of which we spend about 500,000 USD per year.
It's a good deal, for 250 USD/year you get 500K/year software.
The disadvantage of this deal is that you have to put up with the lack of technical support, you can’t talk to anyone with your voice.
To sweeten this moment there is:
- free forum
- paid partners who will talk to you and help you. But they are not part of OneBox, they are separate companies, OneBox did not create them. These companies looked at OneBox for themselves, saw the flaw in the "no support" business model, and decided to capitalize on it.
I talked more about this model here -
https://youtu.be/oAJxxHXbjgAI have already written somewhere else on the forum, but I will repeat:
why can't I talk to OneBox? It's simple - because I want to. It sounds bold, but creating such software as you see (OneBox OS) is possible only in one scenario - if I (and the developers) are not pulled. Therefore, I take a lot of money and pour it into the software, so that later I can distribute it to users for cheap. Such a model.
The second argument why this model is acceptable for the market:
Microsoft, Apple, Google, Adobe, Facebook. Try writing to their support. She just doesn't exist. They have good tech products that cost a penny for users. But not all users can deal with them, and since these companies do not create technical support. As a result, these products themselves are overgrown with third-party companies that close this problem: windows system administrators appear, windows courses appear, iphone customizers appear, google service developers appear, photoshop designers appear, photoshop courses appear, smm-schiks appear.
In simple words: we take a unique product, a good product, mow out "whom you can talk to" out of it - and we get a growth driver.