Wrong logic in Recalculation
When manually editing the quantity of a product, the subsequent scanning of this product adds it again with a new line and confusion arises.
For example, they accidentally scanned one product twice (THIS IS VERY EASY TO DO AND THIS IS A COMMON SITUATION), corrected the quantity manually, then this product is scanned and added again with a new line.
Or, the product is scanned in groups. We scanned one piece, we see that there is still such a product, for example, 3 pieces. Enter the quantity manually. We continue to scan other products. Then the first item hit again. Scanned - and it again appears in a separate line.
Confusion again.
There are many situations, but, in any case, what is this logic for? Support replied that after saving, when scanning, products are added as a new line.
It's absolutely useless. No one needs one product in different lines, especially since the further calculation of Shortage or Surplus occurs relative to the same quantity of goods in stock.
For example,
Original question is available on version: ru
For example, they accidentally scanned one product twice (THIS IS VERY EASY TO DO AND THIS IS A COMMON SITUATION), corrected the quantity manually, then this product is scanned and added again with a new line.
Or, the product is scanned in groups. We scanned one piece, we see that there is still such a product, for example, 3 pieces. Enter the quantity manually. We continue to scan other products. Then the first item hit again. Scanned - and it again appears in a separate line.
Confusion again.
There are many situations, but, in any case, what is this logic for? Support replied that after saving, when scanning, products are added as a new line.
It's absolutely useless. No one needs one product in different lines, especially since the further calculation of Shortage or Surplus occurs relative to the same quantity of goods in stock.
For example,
Answers:
Hello. This is necessary to account for inventory balances with different serial numbers/additional fields. If you do not work with serial numbers and additional fields, as a refinement, you can make it give an error "Such a product is already in the inventory" or make +1 piece to the one already added. The first or second will take about 2 hours.
25.08.2020, 09:21
Original comment available on version: ru
Different stocks are shown for the same product with different serial numbers?!
25.08.2020, 10:03
Original comment available on version: ru
if the warehouse serial numbers are different, then yes, they are considered as different balances. The same applies to additional warehouse fields without the "Ignore when writing off and reserving goods" setting.
25.08.2020, 10:11
Original comment available on version: ru
Nothing like this. In the Restocking section, goods with different serial numbers are added in exactly the same way.
Here you are, there are 2 products in stock with different serial numbers http://joxi.ru/p27ZKdZCN0zKYm
I add without saving http://joxi.ru/p27ZKdZCN0zKYm. No different balances. One line.
I add with preservation http://joxi.ru/eAOEBjETk4X68m. No different balances. In both lines, the quantity in stock is 2, the discrepancy in the end is -2 (one in each line). Well, that's bullshit.
Here you are, there are 2 products in stock with different serial numbers http://joxi.ru/p27ZKdZCN0zKYm
I add without saving http://joxi.ru/p27ZKdZCN0zKYm. No different balances. One line.
I add with preservation http://joxi.ru/eAOEBjETk4X68m. No different balances. In both lines, the quantity in stock is 2, the discrepancy in the end is -2 (one in each line). Well, that's bullshit.
25.08.2020, 14:29
Original comment available on version: ru
sorry, I could make a mistake on the serial numbers (they are not in the inventory). Additional fields will count differently.
27.08.2020, 14:36
Original comment available on version: ru
Well, then it's more logical to select a filter (options, additional fields) before adding, as when adding a product on the order creation page.
Or make sure that when adding the same product, it is always added to one line even after saving, and if additional items are selected. fields, then new.
You have no idea what a huge problem this is.
It is very easy to accidentally scan the same product twice. But if you correct the quantity manually, then that's it ... this product is a new line. You will have to delete and re-search and scan these products, and these can be dozens of pieces.
It is very strange and illogical to give such priority to products with additional fields. We need a golden mean. There should be no possibility in the system to "accidentally harm".
Please pay attention to this.
Or make sure that when adding the same product, it is always added to one line even after saving, and if additional items are selected. fields, then new.
You have no idea what a huge problem this is.
It is very easy to accidentally scan the same product twice. But if you correct the quantity manually, then that's it ... this product is a new line. You will have to delete and re-search and scan these products, and these can be dozens of pieces.
It is very strange and illogical to give such priority to products with additional fields. We need a golden mean. There should be no possibility in the system to "accidentally harm".
Please pay attention to this.
28.08.2020, 00:35
Original comment available on version: ru
+1 I agree that duplication is harmful. In general, the re-account block is primitive, and it is impossible to re-account the cost of goods, for example.
The format of adding goods for redistribution is not very convenient, as for me the format from adding to the Order where you can add "+" goods immediately by search would be more convenient. Or, from the Warehouse leftovers menu, make a button on Send goods to the Restocking list, there is a filter and it is easier to find the goods you need, select them and send them to the List of goods for rediscounting. Think about it. + if the inventory of a large number of goods, then there is no possibility of filtering or sorting them.
The format of adding goods for redistribution is not very convenient, as for me the format from adding to the Order where you can add "+" goods immediately by search would be more convenient. Or, from the Warehouse leftovers menu, make a button on Send goods to the Restocking list, there is a filter and it is easier to find the goods you need, select them and send them to the List of goods for rediscounting. Think about it. + if the inventory of a large number of goods, then there is no possibility of filtering or sorting them.
02.09.2020, 15:56
Original comment available on version: ru
Tarovik Dmitry Nikolaevich The client wrote:
+1 I agree that duplication is harmful. In general, the re-account block is primitive, and it is impossible to re-account the cost of goods, for example. The format of adding goods for redistribution is not very convenient, as for me the format from adding to the Order where you can add "+" goods immediately by search would be more convenient. Or, from the Warehouse leftovers menu, make a button on Send goods to the Restocking list, there is a filter and it is easier to find the goods you need, select them and send them to the List of goods for rediscounting. Think about it. + if the inventory of a large number of goods, then there is no possibility of filtering or sorting them.
support
03.09.2020, 00:33
Original comment available on version: ru
Please join the conversation. If you have something to say - please write a comment. You will need a mobile phone and an SMS code for identification to enter.
Log in and comment
Copyright © OneBox 2024
