supplier's RRP

So what's the problem with downloading the supplier's RRP, and for its RRP to be used as the selling price of the product when recalculating?

[quote] Tyndyk Maxim Vadimovich OneBox production Administrator wrote: So what's the problem with downloading the supplier's RRP, and for its RRP to be used as the selling price of the product when recalculating? [/quote] If the product is in stock, will it take the markup rule for the warehouse, as I understand it, or will it take the RRP even if the product is in stock?

[quote] If the product is in stock, will it take the markup rule for the warehouse, as I understand it, or will it take the RRP even if the product is in stock? [/quote] There is also a priority setting when recalculating prices - there you can choose which is more priority - suppliers or warehouses

[quote] Tyndyk Maxim Vadimovich OneBox production Administrator wrote: [quote] If the product is in stock, will it take the markup rule for the warehouse, as I understand it, or will it take the RRP even if the product is in stock? [/quote] There is also a priority setting when recalculating prices - there you can choose which is more priority - suppliers or warehouses [/quote] Not so, let me explain with an example There is a supplier Biotus, RRC 393 https://crm.dobavki.ua/admin/shop/products/14/supplier/ The product is in stock from this supplier 2 postings https://crm.dobavki.ua/admin/shop/products/14/storage/ First of all, we need to sell from the warehouse, I put the priority on choosing the price from the warehouse + do not apply the RRP of the warehouse https://crm.dobavki.ua/admin/shop/settings/recalculate-price/ I'm doing a recount https://crm.dobavki.ua/admin/shop/products/14/margin/ Takes the goods from the warehouse, puts the sale price 1 in 1 as the purchase price, because there is no rule [file]10320[/file] And in this case, we need to take the RRP from the product card for this supplier, that is, 393 Turned off settings: When recalculating prices for a warehouse, do not take into account RRP Priority changed to supplier Included them to show how we need. If you need to test - you can turn them on and click recalculate.

[quote] Not so, let me explain with an example There is a supplier Biotus, RRC 393 https://crm.dobavki.ua/admin/shop/products/14/supplier/ The product is in stock from this supplier 2 postings https://crm.dobavki.ua/admin/shop/products/14/storage/ First of all, we need to sell from the warehouse, I put the priority on choosing the price from the warehouse + do not apply the RRP of the warehouse https://crm.dobavki.ua/admin/shop/settings/recalculate-price/ I'm doing a recount https://crm.dobavki.ua/admin/shop/products/14/margin/ Takes the goods from the warehouse, puts the sale price 1 in 1 as the purchase price, because there is no rule [/quote] well, why do you then put priority on the warehouse, if you take the RRP from the supplier ??? [quote] Turned off settings: When recalculating prices for a warehouse, do not take into account RRP Priority changed to supplier Included them to show how we need. If you need to test - you can turn them on and click recalculate. [/quote] Well duck indicated the RRC as needed? What is the problem here?

[quote] Tyndyk Maxim Vadimovich OneBox production Administrator wrote: well, why do you then put priority on the warehouse, if you take the RRP from the supplier ??? [/quote] Because the goods first of all need to be sold which is in stock, and then from the price list of the supplier. But for one supplier, you need to sell from a warehouse, but take the price from the price list (this is a requirement of the 1st supplier that you need to sell only by RRP) [quote] Tyndyk Maxim Vadimovich OneBox production Administrator wrote: Well duck indicated the RRC as needed? What is the problem here? [/quote] It indicated the RRP, but chose the price from stock (at the very top it says Selected price 252 from stock

[quote] Because the goods first of all need to be sold which is in stock, and then from the price list of the supplier. But for one supplier, you need to sell from a warehouse, but take the price from the price list (this is a requirement of the 1st supplier that you need to sell only by RRP) [/quote] Do you understand that this is not obvious? You write to sell from a warehouse, but at the same time take the RRP from some supplier - and why exactly from him, and not from some other supplier from those that are suitable according to the rules - such as if he has a lower price for the supplier and there is an RRP? [quote] It indicated the RRP, but chose the price from stock (at the very top it says Selected price 252 from stock [/quote] The price is less - that's indicated.

[quote] Tyndyk Maxim Vadimovich OneBox production Administrator wrote: Do you understand that this is not obvious? You write to sell from a warehouse, but at the same time take the RRP from some supplier - and why exactly from him, and not from some other supplier from those that are suitable according to the rules - such as if he has a lower price for the supplier and there is an RRP? [/quote] This is only needed for the 1st supplier, because this is the requirement of the supplier himself to sell according to the RRP. Let me explain again We need to sell, first of all, the goods that are in stock - this seems to be logical from the point of view of work, we need to sell what we have in stock, and then work according to price lists if you need to buy, etc. But 1 supplier says that his goods should be sold only by RRP, if not RRP, he will not work with us, he does not accept orders. And there are 2 options: 1. To prioritize suppliers - then it will not be logical, we sell not what is in stock, but according to price lists, so it definitely does not fit. 2. Prioritize warehouses - then this supplier will send us to one place and say that we do not sell according to RRP And it turns out that we need some kind of solution so that warehouses have priority, but if we sell from a warehouse from this supplier, we set the price with the RRP, maybe somehow it’s possible in another way, but we didn’t come up with another solution How can this be resolved?