Answers:
1. Option 1h. You choose the payment method for which the action should work. You add yourself 10 actions with different bundles of payment methods, only one necessary one will work and write the amount in the field selected there.
3. If you want to set up this combination right in one action (payment + delivery = required additional field) it will take 2 hours
23.08.2021, 21:04
Original comment available on version: ru
Ok, I'm sold. Let's do it in one step, just so that it works correctly and is optimized. So that it does not turn out that the load is the same with 10 actions (as it is now) and one action. Paint the logic or do you understand everything?)
25.08.2021, 13:14
Original comment available on version: ru
We specify two conditions.
Condition 1. If one of these payment methods (choose three payment methods, can multilist)
"AND"
Condition 2. If one of these sources (select 4 sources in the multilist)
Then write in the additional field.
25.08.2021, 16:14
Original comment available on version: ru
If "payment method 1" or "payment method 2" or "payment method 3"
And
"Source 1" or "Source 2" or "Source 3" or "Source 4"
Then in the additional field record.
25.08.2021, 16:16
Original comment available on version: ru
ugh, that's what I wanted to do. You have the condition AND between payment methods can never be fulfilled, because the payment method in the order is always 1. Launched the billing procedure
25.08.2021, 16:29
Original comment available on version: ru
man everything works. BUT :):):)
I messed up a little with the logic of the action. Need to redo it a bit.
fig1 It is necessary to indicate not which ones should be compared, but those that should not be compared.
That is, if we specify two sources, the action excludes them, and for all the others it works.
Submit an account right away. )))) Easy money
31.08.2021, 17:00
Original comment available on version: ru
those. you need a payment method and a source NOT one of those that you have chosen? You can customize it without modification. You can select all sources except those you need. I don't think you should have too many sources.
01.09.2021, 10:23
Original comment available on version: ru
That's the thing, I'm screwed up here. Over time, I will add new partners, which means new sources will be added. So for all new ones this rule should work, but for my personal sources it doesn't. And it's just that if I add new sources, then in action I will have to make edits.
01.09.2021, 10:28
Original comment available on version: ru
I understand. Look, there the scheme is as follows: if none of the lines matches the conditions, then it takes the field that is selected as the main one. Does she suit you? According to the sources, I realized that I can redo it without a task, I will try during the day
01.09.2021, 10:30
Original comment available on version: ru
Look, there the scheme is as follows: if none of the lines matches the conditions, then it takes the field that is selected as the main one. Does she suit you?
Do not quite understand.
01.09.2021, 10:32
Original comment available on version: ru
you set the conditions from below and select the additional field if the conditions are suitable. If none of the conditions matched, then the uppermost one (which is higher than the conditions) is taken in the additional field
01.09.2021, 10:34
Original comment available on version: ru
you set the conditions from below and select the additional field if the conditions are suitable. If none of the conditions matched, then the uppermost one (which is higher than the conditions) is taken in the additional field
So it still works like this? That's why I turned it off. Like, if none of the conditions came up, the action simply did not work out and that's it. It's just normal for me.
01.09.2021, 10:37
Original comment available on version: ru
Please join the conversation. If you have something to say - please write a comment. You will need a mobile phone and an SMS code for identification to enter.
Log in and comment