Sorting behind the additional field
Good day
Is it possible to sort for additional fields in finance? (actual payments)
/admin/shop/finance/
Yakshcho nі - skilki doopratsyuvannya
Original question is available on version: ru
Is it possible to sort for additional fields in finance? (actual payments)
/admin/shop/finance/
Yakshcho nі - skilki doopratsyuvannya
Answers:
Good afternoon, this functionality is not currently available. Refine this possibility - 3h. Bill.
26.01.2021, 14:42
Original comment available on version: ru
yes, sure. It will work in 2 places: indicated on the screen and when clicking on the additional field in the table header
27.01.2021, 17:39
Original comment available on version: ru
OK
Send rahunok to KoretsValentyn@ukr.net
Send rahunok to KoretsValentyn@ukr.net
27.01.2021, 17:50
Original comment available on version: ru
Aubrey sorting:
First sorting pratsyuє, prote dalі:
Sort by random rank:
https://orc-test.kiev.ua/admin/shop/finance/#
First sorting pratsyuє, prote dalі:
Sort by random rank:
https://orc-test.kiev.ua/admin/shop/finance/#
03.02.2021, 17:37
Original comment available on version: ru
Valentine, do you understand what Default Sorting and Default Sorting 2 mean? First, ALL payments are sorted by the "Prepayment" field, then by the id field among payments with the same value of the "Default sorting" field. Those. if you have 3 payments:
1. id = 1, advance payment = 1
2. id = 2, advance payment=0
3. id = 3, advance payment = 1
then it should show in the following sequence: 1, 3, 2 .
1. id = 1, advance payment = 1
2. id = 2, advance payment=0
3. id = 3, advance payment = 1
then it should show in the following sequence: 1, 3, 2 .
03.02.2021, 17:49
Original comment available on version: ru
I'm miraculously wiser :) And V?)
Say, be kind, as you will:
1. id = 1, advance payment = 1
2. id = 2, advance payment=0
3. id = 3, advance payment = 1
4. id = 4, advance payment=0
Do 2 and 4 different values of the first sorting?
Let's do it for you: "then by the id field among payments with the same value of the "Default sorting" field"
Correct, be kind
Say, be kind, as you will:
1. id = 1, advance payment = 1
2. id = 2, advance payment=0
3. id = 3, advance payment = 1
4. id = 4, advance payment=0
Do 2 and 4 different values of the first sorting?
Let's do it for you: "then by the id field among payments with the same value of the "Default sorting" field"
Correct, be kind
03.02.2021, 17:53
Original comment available on version: ru
In the screenshots, you indicated to sort first by the additional field and then by id. For the first two payments, the value of the additional field = 1 https://prnt.sc/y5vf45 , then it shows all the rest. What's wrong?
03.02.2021, 17:59
Original comment available on version: ru
Those who are not sorted by another. Well, I said.
Sorting on the back of the head for extra. field - everything is okay. (first sorting is done)
Dali, I'm picking for another sorting ID. Nothing appears
Sorting on the back of the head for extra. field - everything is okay. (first sorting is done)
Dali, I'm picking for another sorting ID. Nothing appears
03.02.2021, 18:07
Original comment available on version: ru
Let's write 4 payments again for an example and I will describe in detail how sorting works on them.
04.02.2021, 10:10
Original comment available on version: ru
Boov bi duzhe vdyachny)
Payment ID - 1, Additional field - 1
Payment ID - 3, additional field - 0
ID payment - 4, additional field - 1
id payment - 2, additional field - 0
First sorting - behind the additional field, dropping
Other sorting - per payment ID, growth
Payment ID - 1, Additional field - 1
Payment ID - 3, additional field - 0
ID payment - 4, additional field - 1
id payment - 2, additional field - 0
First sorting - behind the additional field, dropping
Other sorting - per payment ID, growth
04.02.2021, 11:03
Original comment available on version: ru
And what do you see there, vzagali?
At the same time, sorting does not work for the additional field. (in other boxes) If you rewrite - then let me know if you want to know about it.
At the same time, sorting does not work for the additional field. (in other boxes) If you rewrite - then let me know if you want to know about it.
04.02.2021, 11:08
Original comment available on version: ru
1. Boxing takes all payments and divides into 2 groups:
A) Payments with field value 1 (1, 4)
B) Payments with field value 0 (2, 3)
Since the sorting by the additional field is in descending order, then first you will be shown group A and then group B. That is. you will see payments 1 and 4 first.
2. If sorting 2 is specified, then payments INSIDE the group will be sorted according to this sorting. Take for example group A. There are payments with id 1 and 4, since sorting in ascending order will show payment 1 first and payment 4 second. Total:
one
four
2
3
We open your box, we get https://prnt.sc/y9285t 2 payments with an additional field = 1 go first, sorted by ID https://prnt.sc/y92acj in ascending order.
After we see all other payments, sorted in ascending order by id BETWEEN THEMSELVES https://prnt.sc/y92czk , i.e. in your group B
A) Payments with field value 1 (1, 4)
B) Payments with field value 0 (2, 3)
Since the sorting by the additional field is in descending order, then first you will be shown group A and then group B. That is. you will see payments 1 and 4 first.
2. If sorting 2 is specified, then payments INSIDE the group will be sorted according to this sorting. Take for example group A. There are payments with id 1 and 4, since sorting in ascending order will show payment 1 first and payment 4 second. Total:
one
four
2
3
We open your box, we get https://prnt.sc/y9285t 2 payments with an additional field = 1 go first, sorted by ID https://prnt.sc/y92acj in ascending order.
After we see all other payments, sorted in ascending order by id BETWEEN THEMSELVES https://prnt.sc/y92czk , i.e. in your group B
04.02.2021, 11:26
Original comment available on version: ru
I will understand!
Having said from the very beginning, what for the same value of the additional field (1 or 0) can be sorted differently!
ALE:
Axis of what is drawn:
Axis that I may:
Changing other sorting NIYAK does not spit on the witness!
Having said from the very beginning, what for the same value of the additional field (1 or 0) can be sorted differently!
ALE:
Axis of what is drawn:
Axis that I may:
Changing other sorting NIYAK does not spit on the witness!
04.02.2021, 11:50
Original comment available on version: ru
now I understand you, you should have written it right away)) on the previous screenshots you had sorting by id az and, accordingly, the correct output) I'll see what can be done
04.02.2021, 11:58
Original comment available on version: ru
І є one more small nuance іd start not from 4000+
A s 11
A s 11
04.02.2021, 11:59
Original comment available on version: ru
"Now I understand you, you should have written like that right away)) on the previous screenshots you had sorting by id az and, accordingly, the correct output) I'll see what can be done"
Dyakuyu
For other fields, you can't sort. The problem is not less than id.
For example, the "Created" field:
Payments in 2019
Dyakuyu
For other fields, you can't sort. The problem is not less than id.
For example, the "Created" field:
Payments in 2019
04.02.2021, 12:04
Original comment available on version: ru
Please join the conversation. If you have something to say - please write a comment. You will need a mobile phone and an SMS code for identification to enter.
Log in and comment
Copyright © OneBox 2024
