https://box.sheriff.com.ua/ - on one of the client's boxes
there is a problem with switching statuses
in task #2015644287 there is an example of such a process and you can see this problem in it.
In short, the problem is that when switching the status, the process just hangs, the buttons below become inactive and the user just waits for the switch.
I ask the developers to join in the search for the source of this problem and solve it. Such a problem is currently encountered on more than one project (earlier there were also posts with such a problem on this forum).
https://box.sheriff.com.ua/ - on one of the client's boxes there is a problem with switching statuses in task #2015644287 there is an example of such a process and you can see this problem in it. In short, the problem is that when switching the status, the process just hangs, the buttons below become inactive and the user just waits for the switch. I ask the developers to join in the search for the source of this problem and solve it. Such a problem is currently encountered on more than one project (earlier there were also posts with such a problem on this forum).
Hello, the stage can take a long time to switch due to the large number of actions set in the following stages (you have more than 50 of them). To find out which particular action takes a long time, you can turn them off one by one or pay for 2 hours of revision so that the programmer finds out.
Hello, the stage can take a long time to switch due to the large number of actions set in the following stages (you have more than 50 of them). To find out which particular action takes a long time, you can turn them off one by one or pay for 2 hours of revision so that the programmer finds out.
I'm not sure that the client should pay for the search for an error in the work of actions. Regarding disabling actions one by one, alas, I cannot do this, since this is a Combat PSU in which they have been working for at least 2 years. And I can't disrupt the work of about 300 employees.
I'm not sure that the client should pay for the search for an error in the work of actions.
Regarding disabling actions one by one, alas, I cannot do this, since this is a Combat PSU in which they have been working for at least 2 years. And I can't disrupt the work of about 300 employees.
Bushuev Svyatoslav Yurievich Employee wrote: I'm not sure that the client should pay for finding an error in the operation of actions. As for disabling actions one by one, alas, I cannot do this, since this is a Combat BP in which they have been working for at least 2 years. And I can't disrupt the work of about 300 employees.
PS no one asked to do it in the same PSU, you could just copy the PSU and make a new test one - on which you can check everything
[quote]
Bushuev Svyatoslav Yurievich
Employee wrote:
I'm not sure that the client should pay for finding an error in the operation of actions. As for disabling actions one by one, alas, I cannot do this, since this is a Combat BP in which they have been working for at least 2 years. And I can't disrupt the work of about 300 employees.
[/quote]
PS no one asked to do it in the same PSU, you could just copy the PSU and make a new test one - on which you can check everything
Please join the conversation. If you have something to say - please write a comment. You will need a mobile phone and an SMS code for identification to enter.
Log in and comment
Donate
You don't have enough funds in your account Top up