EVALUATE: One product in stock = many unique barcodes of the product in stock
2024-01-15 19:37:13
Leave a message in this thread and the user's contacts will be shown to you
As it is NOW:
1. There is a process of posting to the warehouse
1.1. At the first stage, we create a barcode of the product in the warehouse by:
Create a product bar code in the warehouse for table products
1.2. At the next stage, we place such goods in the warehouse
The bar code of the product in the warehouse is recorded as on the box
2. There is a process for writing off goods from the warehouse
1.1. At the first stage, the goal is to add all the goods from the warehouse.
1.2. We use the interface block to search for goods by barcode in the warehouse
Product search by barcode
But the system does NOT find products now
When searching, it gives an error, as on the screen: Product by product not found
How it SHOULD be:
p. 1 is still the same
item 2
When we use a scanner to scan barcodes from goods that are stored in the warehouse according to the barcode of the goods in the warehouse, such goods should automatically be added to the task
That is, we can have the same product in stock, but with different barcodes in stock
All such goods, when they are sequentially scanned by their barcodes, enter the process in separate terms.
Estimate, please, how much such a modification will cost?
1. There is a process of posting to the warehouse
1.1. At the first stage, we create a barcode of the product in the warehouse by:
Create a product bar code in the warehouse for table products
1.2. At the next stage, we place such goods in the warehouse
The bar code of the product in the warehouse is recorded as on the box
2. There is a process for writing off goods from the warehouse
1.1. At the first stage, the goal is to add all the goods from the warehouse.
1.2. We use the interface block to search for goods by barcode in the warehouse
Product search by barcode
But the system does NOT find products now
When searching, it gives an error, as on the screen: Product by product not found
How it SHOULD be:
p. 1 is still the same
item 2
When we use a scanner to scan barcodes from goods that are stored in the warehouse according to the barcode of the goods in the warehouse, such goods should automatically be added to the task
That is, we can have the same product in stock, but with different barcodes in stock
All such goods, when they are sequentially scanned by their barcodes, enter the process in separate terms.
Estimate, please, how much such a modification will cost?
bandicam 2024-01-15 19-08-46-315.jpg
bandicam 2024-01-15 19-15-52-088.jpg
bandicam 2024-01-15 19-18-35-638.jpg
Original question is available on version: ua
Вячеслав Легеза
Answers:
Легеза Вячеслав
iCOLOR OneBox
iCOLOR OneBox
ФОП Легеза В.В.
Personal license
Leave a message in this thread and the user's contacts will be shown to you
Department of Care maybe you can help?
19.01.2024, 11:40
Вячеслав Легеза
Original comment available on version: ua
Legeza Vyacheslav
iCOLOR OneBox (FOP LEGEZA VIACHESLAV VALERIANOVYCH) wrote:
When we use a scanner to scan barcodes from goods that are stored in the warehouse according to the barcode of the goods in the warehouse, such goods should automatically be added to the task
I wrote a suitable solution option in the previous question https://1b.app/ua/forum/warehouse-management/18137-bag-boks-ne-shukaie-tovar-za-... -by-barcode-not-found/
23.01.2024, 12:14
Original comment available on version: ua
Легеза Вячеслав
iCOLOR OneBox
iCOLOR OneBox
ФОП Легеза В.В.
Personal license
Leave a message in this thread and the user's contacts will be shown to you
Commentary is available in ua and not yet translated to the current language.
23.01.2024, 18:08
Вячеслав Легеза
Легеза Вячеслав
iCOLOR OneBox
iCOLOR OneBox
ФОП Легеза В.В.
Personal license
Leave a message in this thread and the user's contacts will be shown to you
Finally got the bill and paid
An important note to the "responsible" person who issues the bill.
Now it looks like he doesn't care if he gets paid or not
I am up to the fact that:
1. They write stupidly in Viber, although I have already asked SEVERAL times to reset the account in Telegram, I will definitely see it there
2. The invoice was sent to Viber at 11:46
3. I saw only at 15:10, because NO ONE even called
4. Paid at 15:13
That is, together with the developer, we lost several hours of time
I am waiting for a ready-made solution so that I can test it.
An important note to the "responsible" person who issues the bill.
Now it looks like he doesn't care if he gets paid or not
I am up to the fact that:
1. They write stupidly in Viber, although I have already asked SEVERAL times to reset the account in Telegram, I will definitely see it there
2. The invoice was sent to Viber at 11:46
3. I saw only at 15:10, because NO ONE even called
4. Paid at 15:13
That is, together with the developer, we lost several hours of time
I am waiting for a ready-made solution so that I can test it.
24.01.2024, 15:24
Вячеслав Легеза
Original comment available on version: ua
Legeza Vyacheslav
iCOLOR OneBox (FOP LEGEZA VIACHESLAV VALERIANOVYCH) wrote:
Finally got the bill and paid
An important note to the "responsible" person who issues the bill.
Now it looks like he doesn't care if he gets paid or not
and why shouldn't he care? THIS is what YOU need first of all, not us, believe me! FORUM for developers is not a source of income at all, but rather the opposite, so be a little simpler in your expressions
1. it is not clear where and when and to whom you asked, normal ethics is only mail
2. on average, this process can take 3-4 days
3. I didn't ask him to call someone - don't fantasize
Wasted time is your job)
24.01.2024, 18:12
Original comment available on version: ua
Legeza Vyacheslav
iCOLOR OneBox (FOP LEGEZA VIACHESLAV VALERIANOVYCH) wrote:
An important note to the "responsible" person who issues the bill.
Now it looks like he doesn't care if he gets paid or not
looks like treason in an empty space (you could have written: "I expect a bill in Telegram"
I would personally send it to the mail =)
install messengers on your laptop/PC and work - it's not very difficult*
24.01.2024, 19:11
«Один юрист із портфелем у руках награбує більше, ніж банда автоматників»
Original comment available on version: ua
Легеза Вячеслав
iCOLOR OneBox
iCOLOR OneBox
ФОП Легеза В.В.
Personal license
Leave a message in this thread and the user's contacts will be shown to you
Ustimenko Igor
OneBox production wrote:
FORUM for developers
NO complaints AT ALL to the developers
developers don't bill, they do the work
and the person responsible for invoicing is completely different
my comment is directly related to this link
thanks for understanding
24.01.2024, 21:54
Вячеслав Легеза
Original comment available on version: ua
Legeza Vyacheslav
iCOLOR OneBox (FOP LEGEZA VIACHESLAV VALERIANOVYCH) wrote:
Ustimenko Igor
OneBox production wrote:
FORUM for developers
NO complaints AT ALL to the developers
developers don't bill, they do the work
and the person responsible for invoicing is completely different
my comment is directly related to this link
thanks for understanding
the responsible person does as I told her and nothing extra.
I was the one who gave Yevhen the invoicing regulations, I was the one who gave the description of what he should and should not do, so stop writing me this crap, please keep your opinion to yourself, because the further conversation will get out of your way.
25.01.2024, 01:03
Original comment available on version: ua
Please join the conversation. If you have something to say - please write a comment. You will need a mobile phone and an SMS code for identification to enter.
Log in and comment
Copyright © OneBox 2024
