fix action work

[quote] Pereginyak Alexander wrote: please correct the operation of this checkbox and return the ability to load several products with the same id / into the order [/quote] How to understand return? As you write - never worked. The refinement of this setting sounds like this (literally TK): [quote] When enabled, the setting should work like this: If we did not find the position previously imported by the same action, then try to find the position of such a product in the process and update it, if it is not found, add the product in a separate line. If there are 2 identical products in the process in different lines, it will update a random product. [/quote]

[quote] Tyndyk Maxim Vadimovich Administrator wrote: [quote] Pereginyak Alexander wrote: please correct the operation of this checkbox and return the ability to load several products with the same id / into the order [/quote] How to understand return? As you write - never worked. The refinement of this setting sounds like this (literally TK): [quote] When enabled, the setting should work like this: If we did not find the position previously imported by the same action, then try to find the position of such a product in the process and update it, if it is not found, add the product in a separate line. If there are 2 identical products in the process in different lines, it will update a random product. [/quote] [/quote] what you indicated is true for a situation where goods are updated and this is logical, I agree. BUT in my case, you don't need to update the products, so this option should not work because the update is disabled, but it does. Please correct so that if the product update is disabled, then it adds several identical sku to the product table in different rows

[quote] Pereginyak Alexander wrote: what you indicated is true for a situation where goods are updated and this is logical, I agree. BUT in my case, you don't need to update the products, so this option should not work because the update is disabled, but it does. Please correct so that if the product update is disabled, then it adds several identical sku to the product table in different rows [/quote] Alexander, there is a specific specification for setting up - and it works strictly with this description. If you see / want the functionality to work differently, while NOT being the author of the configuration algorithm, this is not a mistake to "fix" it. We can evaluate the implementation of the settings with the logic you need.

[quote] Tyndyk Maxim Vadimovich Administrator wrote: Alexander, there is a specific specification for setting up - and it works strictly with this description. If you see / want the functionality to work differently, while NOT being the author of the configuration algorithm, this is not a mistake to "fix" it. We can evaluate the implementation of the settings with the logic you need. [/quote] yes, here you are always like this, refer to the original TK. I'm sure the original TOR didn't include the "Don't update products" option, which I once personally requested... but oh well, there's no point in arguing with you, everyone will still stay on their side. please rate the update make it so that when the checkboxes "When searching for a process product, do not take into account the binding of previously imported positions" and "Do not update process products when updating" are checked, several positions of one product are loaded into the process, and only one random position is not updated

[quote] Pereginyak Alexander wrote: yes, here you are always like this, refer to the original TK. [/quote] What should I refer to? TK for this is necessary - for the functionality to work according to it. [quote] Pereginyak Alexander wrote: please rate the update make it so that when the checkboxes "When searching for a process product, do not take into account the binding of previously imported positions" and "Do not update process products when updating" are checked, several positions of one product are loaded into the process, and only one random position is not updated [/quote] 3 hours

[quote] Tyndyk Maxim Vadimovich Administrator wrote: What should I refer to? TK for this is necessary - for the functionality to work according to it. [/quote] I understand you, but years pass, the functionality is corrected and the original technical specification loses its relevance as a result of numerous improvements. Therefore, to refer to something that has already lost its relevance, in my opinion, is somehow no longer correct. But this is my opinion. Developers here... [quote] Tyndyk Maxim Vadimovich Administrator wrote: 3 hours [/quote] thank you.