finalize the action

Variables can be specified as a nesting path by separating them with / That is, if you specify aaa/bbb/ccc, then from the array with the key aaa it will try to get the array by the bbb key, and from it the element by the ccc key The only thing is that this enumeration does not support 0 in the path - but this can be finalized in 1 hour. Is this option right for you? Or do you need something else?

[quote] Tyndyk Maxim Vadimovich Administrator wrote: The only thing is that this enumeration does not support 0 in the path - but this can be finalized in 1 hour. [/quote] invoice please

[quote] Tyndyk Maxim Vadimovich Administrator wrote: Variables can be specified as a nesting path by separating them with / That is, if you specify aaa/bbb/ccc, then from the array with the key aaa it will try to get the array by the bbb key, and from it the element by the ccc key The only thing is that this enumeration does not support 0 in the path - but this can be finalized in 1 hour. Is this option right for you? Or do you need something else? [/quote] the problem is that the array passed as a nested array can be dynamic - in some cases the key "aaa" will be in the first line, and in other cases, this key will move to the tenth line. It turns out that you need to search for the parameter value in the nested array by the desired key. Can you evaluate how to implement it?

[quote] Pereginyak Alexander Oneboxconsulting (integrator) wrote: the problem is that the array passed as a nested array can be dynamic - in some cases the key "aaa" will be in the first line, and in other cases, this key will move to the tenth line. It turns out that you need to search for the parameter value in the nested array by the desired key. Can you evaluate how to implement it? [/quote] If you provide logic, then we will evaluate it. So far, I don't understand the logic from your comment. Let's take a look at your examples.

[quote] Tyndyk Maxim Vadimovich Administrator wrote: If you provide logic, then we will evaluate it. So far, I don't understand the logic from your comment. Let's take a look at your examples. [/quote] in the line where the parameters [file]3049[/file] of processing are specified add 1. checkbox "search in the stacked array and write the result to the specified OneBox field" 2. field "identifier of keys in the array (what is the name of the array column in which parameter identifiers are stored)" 3. field "identifier of the desired key in the array (what is the name of the desired parameter (key), the value of which you want to get)" 4. field "identifier of the field with values in the array (what is the name of the array column in which parameter values are stored)" if the checkbox is checked and all fields 2-4 are filled, then get an array that is stored at the address specified in the "Additional field key" field and try to get the value of the array element stored in the column from step 4 for the string whose address was obtained by searching the column from step 2 for the value from step 3 do you still need an example?

[quote] Pereginyak Alexander wrote: do you still need an example? [/quote] better yes because the description is not obvious to me - I don’t think that it will be obvious / convenient for any of the clients later

[quote] Pereginyak Alexander Oneboxconsulting (integrator) wrote: [quote] Tyndyk Maxim Vadimovich Administrator wrote: The only thing is that this enumeration does not support 0 in the path - but this can be finalized in 1 hour. [/quote] invoice please [/quote] invoice please