Unable to bulk delete contacts
2020-11-16 16:15:28
Here is the contact list
https://500np.crm-onebox.com/admin/shop/users/?sortkey=id&sorttype=ASC
We need to delete all contacts in bulk,
leave the first eight, from which we uncheck
BUT, when we remove at least one tick,
mass selection of contacts flies
Please correct
Original question is available on version: ru
Вячеслав Легеза
https://500np.crm-onebox.com/admin/shop/users/?sortkey=id&sorttype=ASC
We need to delete all contacts in bulk,
leave the first eight, from which we uncheck
BUT, when we remove at least one tick,
mass selection of contacts flies
Please correct
Answers:
so it doesn't work
either all or selected on the current page
either all or selected on the current page
16.11.2020, 16:22
Original comment available on version: ru
You remove N pieces from all selected ones and this is not all selected ones at once. This is logical.
Try to temporarily transfer contacts that do not need to be deleted into one group. Do not touch it, and filter and delete other contacts that are in groups (or without a group). Thus, you select everyone and you will not affect the necessary contacts
Try to temporarily transfer contacts that do not need to be deleted into one group. Do not touch it, and filter and delete other contacts that are in groups (or without a group). Thus, you select everyone and you will not affect the necessary contacts
16.11.2020, 16:23
Original comment available on version: ru
Maria
Employee wrote:
You remove N pieces from all selected ones and this is not all selected ones at once. This is logical.
Try to temporarily transfer contacts that do not need to be deleted into one group. Do not touch it, and filter and delete other contacts that are in groups (or without a group). Thus, you select everyone and you will not affect the necessary contacts
The function is handy when I:
- singled out massively 1542;
- unchecked 8 ticks;
- there are 1536 allocated.
It seems that's how it worked before.
It would be desirable to use such logic and further.
Because now it works very strangely:
- singled out massively 1542;
- unchecked 8 ticks;
- 42 left allocated.
16.11.2020, 17:28
Вячеслав Легеза
Original comment available on version: ru
Legeza Vyacheslav Valerianovich
FOP Legeza Vyacheslav Valerianovich wrote:
It seems that's how it worked before.
It would be desirable to use such logic and further.
Vyacheslav, you are mistaken, the system has never worked like this
17.11.2020, 09:29
Original comment available on version: ru
Wow, not just it will finish. We will spend 40+ hours on this, and so far there are no such resources.
Sorry :(
Sorry :(
17.11.2020, 10:35
Как со мной связаться - никак :)Задавайте вопросы на форуме публично - и я отвечу.
Подробнее - https://1b.app/ru/user/11/ Original comment available on version: ru
Miroshnichenko Maxim Alexandrovich
OneBox CEO wrote:
Wow, not just it will finish. We will spend 40+ hours on this, and so far there are no such resources.
Sorry :(
clear,
what would you recommend for the future?
to avoid crooked solutions in a fancy product:
1. Discuss a solution within the team.
2. Peep as others have done.
3. Explain to the client who orders revision,
the crookedness of his desires and offer to do it conveniently.
Max, do you accept such a message for the near future?
17.11.2020, 12:45
Вячеслав Легеза
Original comment available on version: ru
Max, do you accept such a message for the near future?
I? No :) I'm building a flat management system, where nothing at all depends on me, except for the name of the product;)
Since all integrators and sales are separate companies, I have exactly 0 influence there.
17.11.2020, 20:27
Как со мной связаться - никак :)Задавайте вопросы на форуме публично - и я отвечу.
Подробнее - https://1b.app/ru/user/11/ Original comment available on version: ru
Miroshnichenko Maxim Alexandrovich
OneBox CEO wrote:
Max, do you accept such a message for the near future?
I? No :) I'm building a flat management system, where nothing at all depends on me, except for the name of the product;)
Since all integrators and sales are separate companies, I have exactly 0 influence there.
i.e. the product becomes dependent
solely on the quality of solutions,
offered by integrators
A team of developers is working on OneBox
right?
who in your flat model is responsible
for the product architecture as a whole,
for logic and implementation of solutions
18.11.2020, 22:28
Вячеслав Легеза
Original comment available on version: ru
A team of developers is working on OneBox
No, integrators are working on OneBox, it's just that some integrators have access to the code and can add something to it under certain conditions (I'm talking about Ustimenko's team).
I set the architecture of the software product, but the architecture is not the little thing that you are asking for.
Architecture is how one application inside OneBox interacts with another (for example: how contacts and orders are connected).
The system interface is not the architecture.
There are plans in the future to create some interface guidelines and oblige integrators to adhere to them, but each integrator cuts his own applications and puts them in OneBox. Contacts, Business processes, ... - these will all be different applications, which will have their own "author", who is responsible for this application.
Therefore, the next version of OneBox is called OneBox OS - because it is an operating system stuffed with applications for business, where everyone can make their own application and it will interact correctly with others.
19.11.2020, 12:46
Как со мной связаться - никак :)Задавайте вопросы на форуме публично - и я отвечу.
Подробнее - https://1b.app/ru/user/11/ Original comment available on version: ru
Please join the conversation. If you have something to say - please write a comment. You will need a mobile phone and an SMS code for identification to enter.
Log in and comment
Copyright © OneBox 2024
