In the list of processes, the ability to open several processes in other tabs has disappeared.
Previously, I right-clicked and used the standard browser functionality "", and now instead the OneBox menu opens and the process opens in the same tab.
+ standard in all programs, this shortcut made it clear that the page would open in another tab, and not in the same one. It causes dissonance
[file]8286[/file]
[file]8287[/file]
In the list of processes, the ability to open several processes in other tabs has disappeared. Previously, I right-clicked and used the standard browser functionality "", and now instead the OneBox menu opens and the process opens in the same tab. + standard in all programs, this shortcut made it clear that the page would open in another tab, and not in the same one. It causes dissonance
Ustimenko Igor OneBox production wrote: open via ctrl + mouse click
Igor, stop answering simply "from the bulldozer". You yourself perfectly understand that no one will use this except for a group of OneBox programmers. It can be fixed?
[quote]
Ustimenko Igor
OneBox production wrote:
open via ctrl + mouse click
[/quote]
Igor,
stop answering simply "from the bulldozer".
You yourself perfectly understand that no one will use this except for a group of OneBox programmers. It can be fixed?
Ustimenko Igor OneBox production wrote: open via ctrl + mouse click
Igor, stop answering simply "from the bulldozer". You yourself perfectly understand that no one will use this except for a group of OneBox programmers. It can be fixed?
I answer as I see fit once again I repeat the answer we will not change anything on this issue
[quote]
Yurchenko Roman Sergeevich wrote:
[quote]
Ustimenko Igor
OneBox production wrote:
open via ctrl + mouse click
[/quote]
Igor,
stop answering simply "from the bulldozer".
You yourself perfectly understand that no one will use this except for a group of OneBox programmers. It can be fixed?
[/quote]
I answer as I see fit
once again I repeat the answer we will not change anything on this issue
Yurchenko Roman Sergeevich wrote: + standard in all programs, this shortcut made it clear that the page would open in another tab, and not in the same one.
Logically, judging by the icon, it should open in a new contribution.
[quote]
Yurchenko Roman Sergeevich wrote:
+ standard in all programs, this shortcut made it clear that the page would open in another tab, and not in the same one.
[/quote]
Logically, judging by the icon, it should open in a new contribution.
Ustimenko Igor OneBox production wrote: I repeat the answer again, we will not change anything on this issue
Then just return the browser settings. Why did you remove them?
[quote]
Ustimenko Igor
OneBox production wrote:
I repeat the answer again, we will not change anything on this issue
[/quote]
Then just return the browser settings. Why did you remove them?
Yurchenko Roman Sergeevich wrote: + standard in all programs, this shortcut made it clear that the page would open in another tab, and not in the same one.
Logically, judging by the icon, it should open in a new contribution.
let's make an opening in this paragraph in a new tab on this paragraph open will do today
Yurchenko Roman Sergeevich wrote:
Ustimenko Igor OneBox production wrote: I repeat the answer again, we will not change anything on this issue
Then just return the browser settings. Why did you remove them?
we believe that they are not needed and our menu is more useful
[quote]
Kornev Mikhail wrote:
[quote]
Yurchenko Roman Sergeevich wrote:
+ standard in all programs, this shortcut made it clear that the page would open in another tab, and not in the same one.
[/quote]
Logically, judging by the icon, it should open in a new contribution.
[/quote]
let's make an opening in this paragraph in a new tab on this paragraph open
will do today
[quote]
Yurchenko Roman Sergeevich wrote:
[quote]
Ustimenko Igor
OneBox production wrote:
I repeat the answer again, we will not change anything on this issue
[/quote]
Then just return the browser settings. Why did you remove them?
[/quote]
we believe that they are not needed and our menu is more useful
Ustimenko Igor OneBox production wrote: let's make an opening in this paragraph in a new tab on this paragraph open will do today
OK. Let there be another item on the menu to open in a new tab. Thanks
Ustimenko Igor OneBox production wrote: we believe that they are not needed and our menu is more useful
I'm not saying to give it up altogether. There are just different ways of placing and issuing an order. For example, we process an order differently depending on the source or type of issue. For example: 1) when there is registration by phone - this logic can work, although there are many drawbacks: there is no search for a client, there is no way to merge a contact with an existing client (for this reason, I specially created and invested in the "Fill in the contact card" block where it's all there , in addition, this investment involved a large number of users who needed such a function). 2) In order for orders under the Pickup condition (when the client just came to the store without placing an order in advance) - you need to make the minimum number of clicks and windows. For 1 year we tried to get away from this and did at least somehow. Moreover, this was done by two companies - but there is no good result, but now we need to start from the beginning. I also want to add that the functionality of OneBox in any of its versions is not at all created for offline stores and everyone is trying to fix it with some kind of crutches or investments (like me, for example). Igor, I ask you to reconsider your decision. It's just not possible to quickly release a client offline. They are already waiting for several minutes when we let him go.
[quote]
Ustimenko Igor
OneBox production wrote:
let's make an opening in this paragraph in a new tab on this paragraph open
will do today
[/quote]
OK. Let there be another item on the menu to open in a new tab.
Thanks
[quote]
Ustimenko Igor
OneBox production wrote:
we believe that they are not needed and our menu is more useful
[/quote]
I'm not saying to give it up altogether. There are just different ways of placing and issuing an order.
For example, we process an order differently depending on the source or type of issue. For example:
1) when there is registration by phone - this logic can work, although there are many drawbacks: there is no search for a client, there is no way to merge a contact with an existing client (for this reason, I specially created and invested in the "Fill in the contact card" block where it's all there , in addition, this investment involved a large number of users who needed such a function).
2) In order for orders under the Pickup condition (when the client just came to the store without placing an order in advance) - you need to make the minimum number of clicks and windows. For 1 year we tried to get away from this and did at least somehow. Moreover, this was done by two companies - but there is no good result, but now we need to start from the beginning. I also want to add that the functionality of OneBox in any of its versions is not at all created for offline stores and everyone is trying to fix it with some kind of crutches or investments (like me, for example).
Igor, I ask you to reconsider your decision. It's just not possible to quickly release a client offline. They are already waiting for several minutes when we let him go.
Please join the conversation. If you have something to say - please write a comment. You will need a mobile phone and an SMS code for identification to enter.
Log in and comment
Donate
You don't have enough funds in your account Top up