Answers:
Excellent, but 90 USD for such a refinement is a little expensive, you can somehow clubbing it. I think many have such a problem and you can chip in for an hour. do you have such functionality?
07.09.2020, 14:25
Original comment available on version: ru
Anyone can unsubscribe in the task and confirm the desire to make a revision. The cost can be spread over the number of people who want it and put everyone on the bill at 30, for example. You don't need to do any functionality for this.
07.09.2020, 14:35
Original comment available on version: ru
It really seems to me that this is a bug, I don’t really want to make a bunch of crutches that will not work after solving the bug
Let's all together say that this is a bug and ask that they fix the problem or at least tell why they think that this is not a bug
24.09.2020, 15:10
Original comment available on version: ru
Ukrposhta introduces some changes at a slow pace.
in fact, integration rests on a miracle ...
no one invested these three hours and the topic was closed.
26.10.2020, 23:58
Original comment available on version: ru
as far as I can see, there are already at least 3 people who can share the cost equally (1 hour each) and resolve the issue if it is really important to them.
27.10.2020, 12:33
Original comment available on version: ru
No, out of fright, I received a bunch of letters on tasks that were put up for investment 2 years ago
In each letter there was the same thing (what I attached in the screen), as a result, I went through each letter and wrote the same thing "The issue is not resolved!" this task also got into the email pool
28.10.2020, 16:11
Original comment available on version: ru
And if the tariff is in the cloud, then 2 hours are free and we put it in the queue for revision.
And if someone else supports someone's tariff in the cloud for another 2 hours for free.
here 3 people unsubscribed that they want revision.
where can i see the revisions?
31.10.2020, 19:34
Original comment available on version: ru
We partially solved this problem using the formula, but the problem is that Ukrposhta constantly changes the address format (zip code - city - DEPARTMENT NUMBER - street-house-kv and sometimes city street house index) and it is impossible to make a universal formula, besides, note gives this data in one format and well in another, if this is some kind of universal solution that will allow the system to see where the index is and where the branch number is, then this option is suitable, but if this solution is just a formula, then I don’t see much sense because, with each updating the Ukrposhta address format, this setting will fail.
02.11.2020, 13:43
Original comment available on version: ru
You must understand that boxing understands which city and which branch number from the LINE. He cannot determine from ANY line where the city is and where the branch number is. Those. you can give 10 examples of the address format that will be - I can write a parser for them that will parse the address, postal code, branch number, etc. If you decide in half a year that it would be nice to put an index between the street name and the house number, it is natural that the parser will need to be finalized so that it understands the new custom format.
02.11.2020, 13:47
Original comment available on version: ru
Please join the conversation. If you have something to say - please write a comment. You will need a mobile phone and an SMS code for identification to enter.
Log in and comment