Privat24 Autoclient Checklist for accounts does not find process (rozetka) / box_auto_action_privat24_import_payments_autoclient

[quote] Tyndyk Maxim Vadimovich Administrator wrote: [quote] Kupriyan Vladislav Valerievich wrote: What am I doing wrong in the setup and where can I read more about it? [/quote] Most likely, you didn’t find a client, and since the checkbox “If the client is not found, create it according to the data from the payment” is not worth it, it was not created. And you have specified to create in this case payments to "Robot". Accordingly, by the payment client, when searching by regular expressions, the process is looking for your client Robot (I immediately answer - yes, in the https://prnt.sc/vzufq5 setting it searches without a client, and for the https://prnt.sc/vzuhwt settings with client, if any). It would search without a client if it created a new one. Actually, as an option - it is possible to finalize the setting in 1 hour so that these regular expressions work without checking the client. [/quote] Create recommendations did not help, tried in different ways, still did not tie as needed Tried these options: 1. https://prnt.sc/w19jfv 2. Then I clicked another checkbox "Install the client's payment for the process found by the client" 3. Then I pressed the bugs 4. At the same time, I removed the setting "If the client does not know in the system, then make a payment for" that is, empty 5. Therefore, in the field "Regular display:" I wrote "according to\sorder\s#[customorder_zovnishniyiddodpole15]\son", that is, what I wrote earlier in the field "Shukati additional process field according to the template (for example [customorder_key]):" In short, he perverted as soon as he could, but nothing happened, the payment did not become attached to the task https://baza.cn.ua/admin/customorder/issue/30414/edit/ What other options are there for this https://prnt.sc/w19mqe block to work? I am somehow misled by the name of the setting "Shukati on the rahunka field:" it is not entirely clear where the word "rahunku" in the setting drops out additional fields, in the same setting we select an additional field for the regular expression

[quote] Kupriyan Vladislav Valerievich wrote: Create recommendations did not help, tried in different ways, still did not tie as needed Tried these options: 1. https://prnt.sc/w19jfv 2. Then I clicked another checkbox "Install the client's payment for the process found by the client" 3. Then I pressed the bugs 4. At the same time, I removed the setting "If the client does not know in the system, then make a payment for" that is, empty 5. Therefore, in the field "Regular display:" I wrote "according to\sorder\s#[customorder_zovnishniyiddodpole15]\son", that is, what I wrote earlier in the field "Shukati additional process field according to the template (for example [customorder_key]):" In short, he perverted as soon as he could, but nothing happened, the payment did not become attached to the task https://baza.cn.ua/admin/customorder/issue/30414/edit/ What other options are there for this https://prnt.sc/w19mqe block to work? [/quote] Random inclusion of settings - often does not give a result. Especially when I clearly stated above the reason why you will not be contacted and provided a solution with an estimate. [quote] Kupriyan Vladislav Valerievich wrote: I am somehow misled by the name of the setting "Shukati on the rahunka field:" it is not entirely clear where the word "rahunku" in the setting drops out additional fields, in the same setting we select an additional field for the regular expression [/quote] This is how the field was signed - but it is looking for a process with the value of the additional field of the process, the value of which was parsed according to the regular expression from the comment to the payment. It would be possible to test the creation of a client and search for its process on some payment - but this should not be an imported payment yet ...

[quote] Tyndyk Maxim Vadimovich Administrator wrote: Especially when I clearly stated above the reason why you will not be contacted and provided a solution with an estimate. [/quote] You gave the reason I ticked https://prnt.sc/w2f3m9 Logically, this should have solved the problem, that is, the client should be created (it created the client when I tested) Here it is https://baza.cn.ua/admin/shop/users/2804/ But the setting didn't work, why? Here is an example of a payment for you (you can delete it and test it in a minute, when it takes a minute to complete) https://baza.cn.ua/admin/shop/finance/?contractorid=&filterdatefrom=&filterdateto=&filtercomment=492833081&filtersumfrom=0&filtersumto= 0&order=&filterlinkkeyorder=0&clientid=&filternobalance=&filteruserid=&filterdirection=0&filterdocumentid=&filtercode=&filterbankdetail=&ok=%D0%A4%D1%96%D0%BB%D1%8C%D1%82%D1%80%D1%83%D0 %B2%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%B8 That is, it is ordered by order 492833081 Here it should be tied to this task https://baza.cn.ua/admin/customorder/issue/30543/edit/ For this field https://prnt.sc/w2f8k3

[quote] Kupriyan Vladislav Valerievich wrote: Here is an example of a payment for you (you can delete it and test it in a minute, when it will be delayed by a minute kroner) https://baza.cn.ua/admin/shop/finance/?contractorid=&filterdatefrom=&fil... That is, it is ordered by order 492833081 Here it should be tied to this task https://baza.cn.ua/admin/customorder/issue/30543/edit/ For this field https://prnt.sc/w2f8k3 [/quote] No, it shouldn't Additional field parsed, but there is another client - https://baza.cn.ua/admin/shop/users/2804/ I won’t throw the entire issue here, but it has a parameter in it [AUT_CNTR_CRF] => 14360570 - by which the above contact finds by External ID

[quote] Tyndyk Maxim Vadimovich Administrator wrote: No, it shouldn't Additional field parsed, but there is another client - https://baza.cn.ua/admin/shop/users/2804/ I won’t throw the entire issue here, but it has a parameter in it [AUT_CNTR_CRF] => 14360570 - by which the above contact finds by External ID [/quote] Some kind of crap comes out, if I understood you correctly, it turns out that the process was found according to the additional field, but it turned out to be another client, that's why the payment was not tied At the same time, the checkboxes "Set the client of the payment of the client of the found process" + "If the client is not found, create it according to the data from the payment" are checked 1. It seems that these settings should have solved this problem, but they didn’t solve it, or did I misunderstand something? 2. It turns out that this setting will work only if the client of the process will be the same client as the payment?

Vladislav, I'm tired of answering the same thing like a parrot. I've provided you with a description of why it doesn't work and what it takes to make it work (with an estimate). That's all.

[quote] Tyndyk Maxim Vadimovich Administrator wrote: Vladislav, I'm tired of answering the same thing like a parrot. I've provided you with a description of why it doesn't work and what it takes to make it work (with an estimate). That's all. [/quote] Maxim, well, it’s not clear to me, you kind of said that I didn’t have checkboxes turned on, I turned it on, but I didn’t get the result If you said that this action and exactly the block that I indicated would work only if the process client = payment client and there is no way to refine it, then it would be clear to me, and it turns out you somehow encouraged, but alas, if I am correct I understood this block is not working in cases when the process client is not equal to the payment client You have seen my settings and you have seen the test payment, please tell me if there is a configuration option without modification so that that block would work, provided that "the client of the process is not equal to the client of the payment" ?

If someone knows in what cases the setting below works (where you can choose the PSU in which to look), please answer, while it’s not at all clear to me in which cases it works