Operating expenses

Good afternoon. Payment cannot be made anywhere. If you do not have a specific counterparty to whom you are making payments or it is not important in this case, create a “transaction costs” contact and make payments to it.

In fact, they are paid to someone (you can't pay anywhere) - if you don't want to specify specific contacts - do as recommended above.

And why is the client here? I do not pay tax to the client. Why do I have to specify Operating expenses every time if I simply allocate them to the Operating expenses category, which is linked to the payment account Operating expenses. So I still need to create a "customer" Operating costs and link to it every time. To be honest, the oil is buttery. Was it so difficult to foresee the possibility of not being tied to any client, because it does not make sense in my particular case? Only make extra movements. Why?

That's right, your specific case was very difficult to foresee. Since it is specifically yours, it is unique in its kind. Payments are made by someone (you) to someone (another user/company), we did not provide an option when the payment is made to nowhere.

You don't pay tax "anywhere" do you?
You pay it to a specific counterparty - in this case, to a specific tax department.
The client must always be present and needed for further analysis. And whether you will start it correctly or whether you will make all such payments to a "technical" contact is up to you.

That is, I must add my tax administration where I pay taxes to clients. Because you decided that it is necessary for your analysis. Do you think this is normal?

yes, it is correct to specify the counterparty to whom the payment was sent / from whom the payment was received for correct fixation and further analysis

And then why do you make such payments at all, if you do not need them for statistics/analysis in the system?

And why did you decide that I will do an analysis on clients? I have categories and payment accounts for this. But I can't bring my tax department or "operating expenses" to my clients. Because the client is the one who receives a product or service from me and not the other way around. And I don't understand why it is mandatory to link payments to the client. Name at least a counterparty, but not a client. And in general, allocate an account for operating expenses and give it the opportunity to link it to a counterparty by default if your system does not work otherwise. That will settle the matter. Although it is still not clear why it was necessary to make a mandatory binding to a certain client without the possibility to remove it.

No, dear. You make a fool of yourself first and then ask for 4g to clean it up

Let's leave it at that. Have a good day!