Good afternoon. Tell me, is it possible to transfer the value of the multilist to the additional field of the process via api. If yes, how? Thanks in advance
Good afternoon. Tell me, is it possible to transfer the value of the multilist to the additional field of the process via api. If yes, how? Thanks in advance
Zamogilny Dmitry Employee wrote: good afternoon, now the values of additional fields for this request are not saved taking into account types, but you can add this feature in 2 hours
Thank you, we think
[quote]
Zamogilny Dmitry
Employee wrote:
good afternoon, now the values of additional fields for this request are not saved taking into account types, but you can add this feature in 2 hours
[/quote]
Thank you, we think
Dmitry, please also evaluate option 2, add the type of additional process product field - multilist, and add the ability to transfer several values to it when updating the order. Also, please note that you need to be able to filter processes by this type of field.
Dmitry, please also evaluate option 2, add the type of additional process product field - multilist, and add the ability to transfer several values to it when updating the order. Also, please note that you need to be able to filter processes by this type of field.
please note that in this field you will need to pass the id of the products of the process, not the id of the products, and the process that is being updated and when filtering more than 1 process, it will not be possible to get maybe you meant the multilist of products by analogy with the additional fields of the product or contact?
please note that in this field you will need to pass the id of the products of the process, not the id of the products, and the process that is being updated
and when filtering more than 1 process, it will not be possible to get
maybe you meant the multilist of products by analogy with the additional fields of the product or contact?
Zamogilny Dmitry Employee wrote: please note that in this field you will need to pass the id of the products of the process, not the id of the products, and the process that is being updated
Dmitry, I meant just a multilist of not contacts and not products, but the ability to specify several values from the drop-down list
[quote]
Zamogilny Dmitry
Employee wrote:
please note that in this field you will need to pass the id of the products of the process, not the id of the products, and the process that is being updated
[/quote]
Dmitry, I meant just a multilist of not contacts and not products, but the ability to specify several values from the drop-down list
this type of field already exists in the process's additional fields, and as part of the previous assessment, I suggested taking into account any existing type of the process's additional field when updating the process through the API
this type of field already exists in the process's additional fields, and as part of the previous assessment, I suggested taking into account any existing type of the process's additional field when updating the process through the API
[file]4007[/file]
Zamogilny Dmitry Employee wrote: this type of field already exists in the process's additional fields, and as part of the previous assessment, I suggested taking into account any existing type of the process's additional field when updating the process through the API
Dmitry, we need an additional process product field (into the product table) with the multilist lunge type
[quote]
Zamogilny Dmitry
Employee wrote:
this type of field already exists in the process's additional fields, and as part of the previous assessment, I suggested taking into account any existing type of the process's additional field when updating the process through the API
[/quote]
Dmitry, we need an additional process product field (into the product table) with the multilist lunge type
now I understand, in this case, you need not only to add the field + its correct display in the universal block, but to make it possible to take into account the type of additional fields of the process products in the API update request = 2 h + 2 h
now I understand, in this case, you need not only to add the field + its correct display in the universal block, but to make it possible to take into account the type of additional fields of the process products in the API update request = 2 h + 2 h
Zamogilny Dmitry Employee wrote: now I understand, in this case, you need not only to add the field + its correct display in the universal block, but to make it possible to take into account the type of additional fields of the process products in the API update request = 2 h + 2 h
Dmitry, we are launching the project https://crm.hlr.ua/, on account of paid hours (there are 13 more hours of improvements). PS. Is it taken into account that the process filter should also work on this field type?
[quote]
Zamogilny Dmitry
Employee wrote:
now I understand, in this case, you need not only to add the field + its correct display in the universal block, but to make it possible to take into account the type of additional fields of the process products in the API update request = 2 h + 2 h
[/quote]
Dmitry, we are launching the project https://crm.hlr.ua/, on account of paid hours (there are 13 more hours of improvements).
PS. Is it taken into account that the process filter should also work on this field type?
Shatokhina Irina wrote: PS. Is it taken into account that the process filter should also work on this field type?
yes, in process filters this type of process product additional field will work similarly to a similar type of process additional field (as in the Additional field filter)
[quote]
Shatokhina Irina wrote:
PS. Is it taken into account that the process filter should also work on this field type?
[/quote]
yes, in process filters this type of process product additional field will work similarly to a similar type of process additional field (as in the Additional field filter)
[file]4071[/file]
Irina, do you need to take into account only the type of the additional field of the process product in the API request, or also the type of the additional field of the process (answer 03/05/2021, Friday, 11:04)?
Irina, do you need to take into account only the type of the additional field of the process product in the API request, or also the type of the additional field of the process (answer 03/05/2021, Friday, 11:04)?
Zamogilny Dmitry Employee wrote: Irina, do you need to take into account only the type of the additional field of the process product in the API request, or also the type of the additional field of the process (answer 03/05/2021, Friday, 11:04)?
Dmitry, if in 4 hours you can add one and the other, then both fields (both the process and the product of the process) are needed. If there is only one, then at the moment it is exactly the additional fields of the process product (product table) that are needed
[quote]
Zamogilny Dmitry
Employee wrote:
Irina, do you need to take into account only the type of the additional field of the process product in the API request, or also the type of the additional field of the process (answer 03/05/2021, Friday, 11:04)?
[/quote]
Dmitry, if in 4 hours you can add one and the other, then both fields (both the process and the product of the process) are needed. If there is only one, then at the moment it is exactly the additional fields of the process product (product table) that are needed
Irina, this logic should be added to your box tonight field values with the multilist type for process products in this API request must be passed comma-separated without spaces please check if everything will work correctly
Irina, this logic should be added to your box tonight
field values with the multilist type for process products in this API request must be passed comma-separated without spaces
please check if everything will work correctly
Zamogilny Dmitry wrote: Irina, this logic should be added to your box tonight field values with the multilist type for process products in this API request must be passed comma-separated without spaces please check if everything will work correctly
Dmitry, preliminary everything is fine, before the end of the day we will check for a real request from 1s and unsubscribe
[quote]
Zamogilny Dmitry wrote:
Irina, this logic should be added to your box tonight
field values with the multilist type for process products in this API request must be passed comma-separated without spaces
please check if everything will work correctly
[/quote]
Dmitry, preliminary everything is fine, before the end of the day we will check for a real request from 1s and unsubscribe
Dmitry, there was such a problem, in the value of the modified multilist field there is an & sign and everything after it does not fall into the field Here is an example request https://crm.hlr.ua/api/orders/update/?login=LOGIN&password=PASSWORD&orde... Phenomenex, Glaswarenfabrik Karl Hecht GmbH & Co. KG, in the process, an incomplete value was displayed and this is what is in the logs Is it possible to make all values be taken as field values, and not as part of the request? process for testing https://crm.hlr.ua/admin/customorder/test/60650/edit/ Thanks
Dmitry, there was such a problem, in the value of the modified multilist field there is an & sign and everything after it does not fall into the field
Here is an example request https://crm.hlr.ua/api/orders/update/?login=LOGIN&password=PASSWORD&orderid=60650&productArray[0][code1c]=5efe1bb6-5aed-11eb-8bc9-00155d000b00&productArray[0][custom_brendmultispisok95]= Phenomenex, Glaswarenfabrik Karl Hecht GmbH & Co. KG, in the process, an incomplete value [file]4570[/file] was displayed and this is what is in the logs [file]4571[/file] Is it possible to make all values be taken as field values, and not as part of the request? process for testing https://crm.hlr.ua/admin/customorder/test/60650/edit/
Thanks
Please join the conversation. If you have something to say - please write a comment. You will need a mobile phone and an SMS code for identification to enter.
Log in and comment
Donate
You don't have enough funds in your account Top up