Report_Act of reconciliation of operations and payments

[quote] I can also calculate the sum of all products in the add. the process field with the total amount. You need a setting option that will allow you to take such a value as the amount of goods received in the report and display it. [/quote] can it be better with a separate column only additional costs? so that there were warehouses, additional costs and payments? and in the table when turning over, similarly to warehouse operations and payments, there will be a separate line with the name of the same additional field of the process and its amount? Well, or in the warehouse operations to summarize, but it displays a separate line with a description of what it is I think that way there will be less confusion about what and where

[quote] Maksym Vadimovych Tyndyk OneBox production wrote: [quote] I can also calculate the sum of all products in the add. the process field with the total sum. You need a setting option that will allow you to take such a value as the amount of goods received in the report and display it. [/quote] can it be better with a separate column only additional costs? so that there were warehouses, additional costs and payments? and in the table when turning over, similarly to warehouse operations and payments, there will be a separate line with the name of the same additional field of the process and its amount? Well, or in the warehouse operations to summarize, but it displays a separate line with a description of what it is I think that way there will be less confusion about what and where [/quote] And there is an option to do as you wrote "with a separate column with the name", but to make options to hide/show the column. So that the client can display the desired emu?

[quote] And there is an option to do as you wrote "with a separate column with the name", but to make options to hide/show the column. So that the client can display the desired emu? [/quote] Well, it was supposed to be output by setting and to indicate on the basis of which additional field of the process to calculate the consumption in this column. But warehouse operations will remain as they are. Such implementation will take about 5 hours

[quote] Maksym Vadimovych Tyndyk OneBox production wrote: Well, it was supposed to be output by setting and to indicate on the basis of which additional field of the process to calculate the consumption in this column. But warehouse operations will remain as they are. Such implementation will take about 5 hours [/quote] Ok, that is, we display the required field for display and it will read Warehouse operations - Amount of value by add. field - Expense = Balance If I do not display the column of Warehouse operations, then it will be considered the Sum of the values according to add. field - Expense = Balance Did I understand correctly?

[quote] Ok, that is, we display the required field for display and it will read Warehouse operations - Amount of value by add. field - Expense = Balance If I do not display the column of Warehouse operations, then it will be considered the Sum of the values according to add. field - Expense = Balance Did I understand correctly? [/quote] No, I didn't suggest that. You have columns now "Initial balance" - "Income" - "Expenditure" - "Final balance" And I suggest making the settings so that there are columns "Initial balance" - "Income" - "Expenditure" - "Additional expenses (from the additional field of the process) - "Final balance"

[quote] Maksym Vadimovych Tyndyk OneBox production wrote: [quote] Ok, that is, we display the required field for display and it will read Warehouse operations - Amount of value by add. field - Expense = Balance If I do not display the column of Warehouse operations, then it will be considered the Sum of the values according to add. field - Expense = Balance Did I understand correctly? [/quote] No, I didn't suggest that. You have columns now "Initial balance" - "Income" - "Expenditure" - "Final balance" And I suggest making the settings so that there are columns "Initial balance" - "Income" - "Expenditure" - "Additional expenses (from the additional field of the process) - "Final balance" [/quote] I just need to replace "Income" with "Additional expenses (with additional process field)" and displays the additional value in the column. field process Is it possible to do so?

[quote] I just need to replace "Income" with "Additional expenses (with additional process field)" and displays the additional value in the column. field process Is it possible to do so? [/quote] It is possible, but it will add another 4 hours to refactoring the report The total will be 9

[quote] Maksym Vadimovych Tyndyk OneBox production wrote: It is possible, but it will add another 4 hours to refactoring the report The total will be 9 [/quote] OK. Then let's evaluate the total: Refactoring + make a setting displays the Add value instead of the Arrival value. fields Give the possibility to set the name of the column for Add. fields (well, or to leave also the Arrival) In the formula, when the setting is turned on, instead of Income, consider the value of Add. process fields How much will everything be together?

[quote] How much will everything be together? [/quote] I evaluated you above specific 2 points, indicated how it will work and in general - spend 2 minutes of your time to think and read.

[quote] Maksym Vadimovych Tyndyk OneBox production wrote: [quote] How much will everything be together? [/quote] I evaluated you above specific 2 points, indicated how it will work and in general - spend 2 minutes of your time to think and read. [/quote] I asked again in the context of the same 2 points. I don't want to be misunderstood. Please clarify once more what the hours will be in the end, so that I better understand what will happen: [quote] Maksym Vadimovych Tyndyk OneBox production wrote: [quote] And there is an option to do as you wrote "with a separate column with the name", but to make options to hide/show the column. So that the client can display the desired emu? [/quote] Well, it was supposed to be output by setting and to indicate on the basis of which additional field of the process to calculate the consumption in this column. But warehouse operations will remain as they are. Such implementation will take about 5 hours [/quote] We display a separate column for additional field and calculate the consumption according to it. There will be settings for displaying this column and hiding the Arrival column Is everything correct? = 5 hours [quote] Maksym Vadimovych Tyndyk OneBox production wrote: [quote] I just need to replace "Income" with "Additional expenses (with additional process field)" and displays the additional value in the column. field process Is it possible to do so? [/quote] It is possible, but it will add another 4 hours to refactoring the report The total will be 9 [/quote] There will be refactoring. And the setting that will allow you to substitute additional values into the formula for calculations. process fields Is everything correct? = 4 hours

1. Output of a separate column based on additional process fields and refactoring of all report calculations - 5 hours 2. Hiding the Arrival column and refactoring all report calculations - 4 hours Total: 5 + 4 = 9

[quote] Maksym Vadimovych Tyndyk OneBox production wrote: 1. Output of a separate column based on additional process fields and refactoring of all report calculations - 5 hours 2. Hiding the Arrival column and refactoring all report calculations - 4 hours Total: 5 + 4 = 9 [/quote] Another question - and in the formula "Initial balance" - Additional expenses (from the additional field of the process) - "Expenditure" - "Final balance" = Balance Initial and final - does it take into account warehouse operations? Or by refactoring, we will make a calculation there based on the selected add-on. process field?

[quote] Initial and final - does it take into account warehouse operations? [/quote] Начальный будет работать exactly the same as it works now

[quote] Maksym Vadimovych Tyndyk OneBox production wrote: [quote] Initial and final - does it take into account warehouse operations? [/quote] Начальный будет работать exactly the same as it works now [/quote] Then there is a problem. The balance will be shown to the client in the ego's idea - incorrect. There is an option to change this logic to take into account the value of additional fields? So, if in the current version we consider Arrival as an additional value. the Initial field should also be taken into account on it