Variable operation [cdatetime]

Everything is correct, but it is also necessary that the value of the additional field also be with the type "Date and time" + Your check is not quite correct - it checks if the values of the additional field are less than the current date and time, then it works. You need the opposite, check if the value of the additional field is greater than the current date and time, then work, just change the condition

[quote] Sukhanitsky Andrey OneBox Corp. Integrator wrote: You need the opposite, check if the value of the additional field is greater than the current date and time, then work, just change the condition [/quote] Soryan, everything is right with you, just check the type of your field

[quote] Sukhanitsky Andrey OneBox Corp. Integrator wrote: Everything is correct, but it is also necessary that the value of the additional field also be with the type "Date and time" [/quote] So it is initially) [quote] Sukhanitsky Andrey OneBox Corp. Integrator wrote: + Your check is not quite correct - it checks if the values of the additional field are less than the current date and time, then it works. You need the opposite, check if the value of the additional field is greater than the current date and time, then work, just change the condition [/quote] Why?) If you put that the value of add. fields are greater than the current date and time, then it will immediately work)) Example: now 10.12 , and I set 12.12 12:00 10.12 < 12.12 12:00 - voila, the action will work. And if I put less, then everything works correctly. The question is that time is not taken into account (specified an example in the description)

[quote] Timofeev Artem Olegovich KTS wrote: The question is that time is not taken into account (specified an example in the description) [/quote] I already wrote that everything is ok with the condition, then check the value in the process

verification works fine, I always set it up like this, it works flawlessly

[quote] Sukhanitsky Andrey OneBox Corp. Integrator wrote: verification works fine, I always set it up like this, it works flawlessly [/quote] I also set it up like this, but in this case it does not work.

1) check if the field is filled 2) what is the value of the additional field and what is the current time? 3) where did you switch to when you switched to a status with a check?

[quote] Maria OneBox production wrote: https://onebox.mim.kiev.ua/30044/ [/quote] Colleagues, so, but nothing that the time is set - [file]12921[/file] The question was: [quote] Timofeev Artem Olegovich KTS wrote: The idea is that when the value in the field with the date and time type is completely less than the current date and time, the transition to the stage worked. In fact, it turns out that it only checks the date - https://onebox.mim.kiev.ua/30044/ , and time does not take into account [/quote] We have not yet reached 09.12 21:00, and the action has already worked. Accordingly, the question is - is time taken into account correctly? [quote] Sukhanitsky Andrey OneBox Corp. Integrator wrote: 1) check if the field is filled 2) what is the value of the additional field and what is the current time? 3) where did you switch to when you switched to a status with a check? [/quote] 1) Of course - [file]12921[/file] https://onebox.mim.kiev.ua/app/history/orders/30044/?systemchange=1&filter2_key=valueold&filter2_type=search&filter2_value=&filter3_key=valuenew&filter3_type=search&filter3_value=&fieldkey=&filtercdatefrom=&filtercdateto= [file]12922[/file] 2) [file]12922[/file] [file]12923[/file] - it is clearly visible that the action worked at 00:11 09.12 3) [file]12923[/file] to where it should have been, but did not take into account the time, but only the date

Artem, do you have another example of a process that switched at the wrong time? So that the field that you are checking is set and the date and time are not 00:00:00

[quote] Timofeev Artem Olegovich KTS wrote: 3) where it should have been, but did not take into account the time, but only the date [/quote] in the description in the check, the field "Date of completion of the Event" is indicated, and on the screenshots you show "Date until". Either you renamed, or another field in the check

[quote] Sukhanitsky Andrey OneBox Corp. Integrator wrote: [quote] Timofeev Artem Olegovich KTS wrote: 3) where it should have been, but did not take into account the time, but only the date [/quote] in the description in the check, the field "Date of completion of the Event" is indicated, and on the screenshots you show "Date until". Either you renamed, or another field in the check [/quote] Everything is right there. showed this field on the screenshot of the Log - this is a system

[quote] Maria OneBox production wrote: Artem, Andrey wrote everything correctly. You have a date that is being checked with the value "2021-12-09 00:00:00" and the switch occurred at "2021-12-09 00:00:11". The condition has been met. Time is taken into account. Whatever time is not taken into account, but only the date is another variable [/quote] Figured it out on a few tests. Now time counts. There is a possibility that the client did not set the time