The action "Change the value of the process field in the fallback from another process field" does not work (if the payment was received in the subordinate task)/

[quote] 1. Why does the action not work when linking process 51481 to order 51477 (that is, in the part of the setting "Allow payment after payment is added", the payment is added, it should seem to work)? [/quote] No, it shouldn't. Where the payment was added - the corresponding action at the stage is triggered there. [quote] 2. Why, when the binding is in progress, it does not work in action (in the parent), that is, in the part of the setting "Allow to do spratsovuvat when saving the process"? [/quote] The parent process is not updated when the child is bound - it is in the child that the parent is updated. [quote] 3. Why in the process https://baza.cn.ua/admin/customorder/order/51477/edit/ in the field "Paid" shows the amount of payment, but in the list of orders https://baza.cn.ua/admin /customorder/order/?filtershowprocess=&filterdeliver... shows 0 in paid field? [/quote] Because in the block it counts when the page is loaded, and in the list it displays from the database column. Probably you did not have a recalculation of the payment amount after binding.

[quote] Tyndyk Maxim Vadimovich OneBox production Administrator wrote: Because in the block it counts when the page is loaded, and in the list it displays from the database column. Probably you did not have a recalculation of the payment amount after binding. [/quote] Strange comment, which in turn only generates questions 1. And why does it count in the block when loading if there is this field in the database? 2. You write "you did not have a recalculation of the payment amount after binding", so the question is for you why the system does not recalculate after binding, but logically it should do it? 3. In what cases does the system recalculate the amount? 4. How to make it so that when there is a subprocess binding that has a payment, what would the parent consider this payment as the payment amount?

[quote] Strange comment, which in turn only generates questions [/quote] We are always very happy to answer your questions, it's not a problem :) [quote] 1. And why does it count in the block when loading if there is this field in the database? [/quote] Because that's the way it works. With the correct recalculation of the process parents tree, all will have the correct payment amount. [quote] 2. You write "you did not have a recalculation of the payment amount after binding", so the question is for you why the system does not recalculate after binding, but logically it should do it? [/quote] There was the word "probably" at the beginning. If you provide a description of the actions (in manual mode) in which the amount is not recalculated when added to the payment process, I will fix it. [quote] 3. In what cases does the system recalculate the amount? [/quote] Mostly when adding/editing a payment to a process(es). But I do not deny that with certain actions this may not happen (which is what I requested in paragraph 2). [quote] 4. How to make it so that when there is a subprocess binding that has a payment, what would the parent consider this payment as the payment amount? [/quote] This should happen by default unless otherwise prohibited by system settings. If you can add a payment to the process so that it does not count - give links to the processes and the sequence of actions - I will repeat and check. According to the process indicated in the description, I do not understand the entire sequence of your actions.

[quote] Tyndyk Maxim Vadimovich OneBox production Administrator wrote: If you can add a payment to the process so that it does not count - give links to the processes and the sequence of actions - I will repeat and check. According to the process indicated in the description, I do not understand the entire sequence of your actions. [/quote] It seems like I described everything in detail, well, I'll try to describe it again There is a payment https://baza.cn.ua/admin/shop/finance/payment/16515/control/ It is tied to the task https://baza.cn.ua/admin/customorder/issue/51481/edit/ There is an order https://baza.cn.ua/admin/customorder/order/51477/edit/ This is all test, that is, you can try to repeat it yourself We take in the task 51481 we write where the parent writes 51477 As a result, the task is linked to the order And in the order https://baza.cn.ua/admin/customorder/order/51477/edit/ In the block, the total shows in the paid field But there is no list in orders https://baza.cn.ua/admin/customorder/order/?filtershowprocess=&filterdelivery=&filtercustomoplatacherez4=&filterpayment=&filtercdatefrom=&filtercdateto=&filterdeliverynote=&filternumber=51477&filtername=&filterproductid=&filterproductname=&filterclientid[0]= &filterauthorid=&filtermanagerid=&workflowid[0]=12&statusid[0]=146&statusid[1]=67&statusid[2]=134&statusid[3]=69&statusid[4]=77&statusid[5]=103&statusid[6]=115&statusid[7]=116&statusid [8]=117&statusid[9]=118&statusid[10]=119&statusid[11]=78&statusid[12]=140&statusid[13]=142&statusid[14]=144&statusid[15]=155&statusid[16]=156&statusid[17]=157&statusid [18]=158&filterdeletedid=&filternovaposhtastatus=&filtersumfrom=&filtersumto=&filtercode1c=&filterintervalfrom=&filterintervalto=&ok=1&searchLine=# [quote] Tyndyk Maxim Vadimovich OneBox production Administrator wrote: This should happen by default unless otherwise prohibited by system settings. [/quote] What setting are we talking about (I remember that there was some kind of setting related to this, but I could not find it)?

Will you be able to answer or create a new problem?

[quote] Tyndyk Maxim Vadimovich OneBox production Administrator wrote: If you provide a description of the actions (in manual mode) in which the amount is not recalculated when added to the payment process, I will fix it. [/quote] I gave you everything you asked for But you are doing something wrong, in fact, everything you need to solve the problem was in the description and an example, including But this is not enough for you and you need examples (at the same time, you understand that you limited me to 1 message per day), I provided it to you and after that there was silence for 2 weeks I set a separate task https://crm-onebox.com/ru/support/onebox-purchase-and-rates/11167-net-reaktsii-po-zadache-sozdayu-dubl/ I thought maybe you are working according to the old scheme, more tasks are more salaries, but they also "cut off" there Please give me a solution!

[quote] Kupriyan Vladislav Valerievich Client Baza.cn.ua / Integrator (FOP Kupriyan) wrote: [quote] Tyndyk Maxim Vadimovich OneBox production Administrator wrote: If you provide a description of the actions (in manual mode) in which the amount is not recalculated when added to the payment process, I will fix it. [/quote] I gave you everything you asked for But you are doing something wrong, in fact, everything you need to solve the problem was in the description and an example, including But this is not enough for you and you need examples (at the same time, you understand that you limited me to 1 message per day), I provided it to you and after that there was silence for 2 weeks I set a separate task https://crm-onebox.com/ru/support/onebox-purchase-and-rates/11167-net-reaktsii-po-zadache-sozdayu-dubl/ I thought maybe you are working according to the old scheme, more tasks are more salaries, but they also "cut off" there Please give me a solution! [/quote] +

In short, as I understand it, you have a dead end in the decision Created ping 1 https://crm-onebox.com/ru/support/onebox-purchase-and-rates/11167-net-reaktsii-po-zadache-sozdayu-dubl/ Created ping 2 https://crm-onebox.com/ru/support/business-processes/11414-proshu-reshit-bag/ To solve the problem, I put the goods in reserve, described everything 2 times And the result is zero - the attitude is disregard

Ustimenko said that you will answer, give an answer or tell me please when you will do it?

I am writing a comment so that I do not receive a message every day in the mail "please mark the correct answer"

In short, I won’t be so clear about the decision, why did you ask for the data, I spent an hour putting the goods in reserve, robbed the test order (trimming the reserve pid test) Service is greedy!