Leave a message in this thread and the user's contacts will be shown to you
You need to add a checkmark to the settings of the process stages, as on the screen
[file]22510[/file]
[file]22511[/file]
Do not display status in the filter panel
[file]22510[/file]
[file]22511[/file]
This is necessary so that such statuses do not fall into the filtering stages, see the second screenshot.
[file]22510[/file]
[file]22511[/file]
Rate the work, please
[file]22510[/file]
[file]22511[/file]
[file]22510[/file]
[file]22511[/file]
[file]22510[/file]
[file]22511[/file]
You need to add a checkmark to the settings of the process stages, as on the screen
Do not display status in the filter panel
This is necessary so that such statuses do not fall into the filtering stages, see the second screenshot.
I can suggest making a list of statuses in the filter itself that should be ignored when outputting. In the status itself, it would not be very obvious to choose this, as for me. It will take 2 hours.
I can suggest making a list of statuses in the filter itself that should be ignored when outputting. In the status itself, it would not be very obvious to choose this, as for me. It will take 2 hours.
Leave a message in this thread and the user's contacts will be shown to you
let him cook
OneBox production wrote:
I can suggest making a list of statuses in the filter itself, which should be ignored when outputting. In the status itself, it is not very obvious to choose it as for me. It will take 2 hours.
Such a setting already exists, but it is currently too overloaded.
It is especially difficult when several processes must fall under the filter at the same time.
Now the goal is to limit visible statuses from the developer side.
In order NOT to show at all those statuses that, according to the logic of the process, it is not necessary to see, since they are more of a technical nature, although they are necessary
[quote]
[file]22521[/file]
let him cook
[file]22521[/file]
OneBox production wrote:
[file]22521[/file]
I can suggest making a list of statuses in the filter itself, which should be ignored when outputting. In the status itself, it is not very obvious to choose it as for me. It will take 2 hours.
[file]22521[/file]
[/quote]
[file]22521[/file]
Such a setting already exists, but it is currently too overloaded.
[file]22521[/file]
It is especially difficult when several processes must fall under the filter at the same time.
[file]22521[/file]
Now the goal is to limit visible statuses from the developer side.
[file]22521[/file]
In order NOT to show at all those statuses that, according to the logic of the process, it is not necessary to see, since they are more of a technical nature, although they are necessary
[file]22521[/file]
[file]22521[/file]
Leave a message in this thread and the user's contacts will be shown to you
let him cook OneBox production wrote: Well, I would then just select all of these in the filters.
now it's very inconvenient, because the filters include stages that are generally technical and should not be displayed, I clog the filter. As it is now, it does not solve the problem, since everyone has to configure it separately.
let him cook OneBox production wrote: I don't see the point of doing it inside the status
And therefore, from my point of view, the additional setting will make it much easier to work with process filters on relevant stages for executors
[quote]
let him cook
OneBox production wrote:
Well, I would then just select all of these in the filters.
[/quote]
now it's very inconvenient, because the filters include stages that are generally technical and should not be displayed, I clog the filter.
As it is now, it does not solve the problem, since everyone has to configure it separately.
[quote]
let him cook
OneBox production wrote:
I don't see the point of doing it inside the status
[/quote]
And therefore, from my point of view, the additional setting will make it much easier to work with process filters on relevant stages for executors
ok, no problem. 1. Check the “technical status” status settings. 2h 2. Make a setting in the filtering panel in the “hide technical statuses” block. 2h only 4 hours, issue an invoice?
ok, no problem.
1. Check the “technical status” status settings. 2h
2. Make a setting in the filtering panel in the “hide technical statuses” block. 2h
only 4 hours, issue an invoice?
Leave a message in this thread and the user's contacts will be shown to you
let him cook OneBox production wrote: ok, no problem. 1. Check the "technical status" status settings. 2 hours 2. Make settings in the filtering panel in the desired block "hide technical statuses". 2 hours only 4 hours, bill?
it turns out expensive if 2 hours were enough, then I am ready to pay
[quote]
let him cook
OneBox production wrote:
ok, no problem.
1. Check the "technical status" status settings. 2 hours
2. Make settings in the filtering panel in the desired block "hide technical statuses". 2 hours
only 4 hours, bill?
[/quote]
it turns out expensive
if 2 hours were enough, then I am ready to pay
Please join the conversation. If you have something to say - please write a comment. You will need a mobile phone and an SMS code for identification to enter.
Log in and comment
Donate
You don't have enough funds in your account Top up