Good afternoon. The report is set up here https://crm.hlr.ua/admin/report/desiner/10/view/, grouping by the additional field https://prnt.sc/10jmjde is set, these are contact directory fields, it has only two values in processes , but the report displays the contact ID in some processes, and in some the contact's full name https://prnt.sc/10jmk9c, I noted with arrows that this is the ID of the same contact.
Interestingly, the full name is displayed only for processes before November 2020 https://prnt.sc/10jmm7u, and after that only the id https://prnt.sc/10jmmtw. But if we expand the grouping https://prnt.sc/10jmnt8 we see the full name. Please correct so that you can see the full name in the report now in a collapsed form. Thanks
Good afternoon. The report is set up here https://crm.hlr.ua/admin/report/desiner/10/view/, grouping by the additional field https://prnt.sc/10jmjde is set, these are contact directory fields, it has only two values in processes , but the report displays the contact ID in some processes, and in some the contact's full name https://prnt.sc/10jmk9c, I noted with arrows that this is the ID of the same contact. Interestingly, the full name is displayed only for processes before November 2020 https://prnt.sc/10jmm7u, and after that only the id https://prnt.sc/10jmmtw. But if we expand the grouping https://prnt.sc/10jmnt8 we see the full name. Please correct so that you can see the full name in the report now in a collapsed form. Thanks
what is the bug in the system? until November 2020, you had in this additional field the data type string total and full name was a string in processes then the field type was changed, but the data remained old, so you get what you see before your eyes I don't see any error here.
what is the bug in the system?
until November 2020, you had in this additional field the data type string total and full name was a string in processes
then the field type was changed, but the data remained old, so you get what you see before your eyes
I don't see any error here.
Ustimenko Igor OneBox CTO wrote: what is the bug in the system? until November 2020, you had in this additional field the data type string total and full name was a string in processes then the field type was changed, but the data remained old, so you get what you see before your eyes I don't see any error here.
Igor, thanks, I was sure that the field type did not change
[quote]
Ustimenko Igor
OneBox CTO wrote:
what is the bug in the system?
until November 2020, you had in this additional field the data type string total and full name was a string in processes
then the field type was changed, but the data remained old, so you get what you see before your eyes
I don't see any error here.
[/quote]
Igor, thanks, I was sure that the field type did not change
Please join the conversation. If you have something to say - please write a comment. You will need a mobile phone and an SMS code for identification to enter.
Log in and comment
Donate
You don't have enough funds in your account Top up