Bug

https://prnt.sc/vvnnm4 also groups by emptiness. Why did you decide that it shouldn't?

Hello. You have not completed the settings that take into account the completion of the fields https://prnt.sc/vvnnio + if you can click the button several times, then it is advisable to check the box https://prnt.sc/vvnogh (only if you need to add the same product twice to different tasks)

[quote] Bodyako Dmitry Employee wrote: https://prnt.sc/vvnnm4 also groups by emptiness. Why did you decide that it shouldn't? [/quote] Those. Are you saying that emptiness is a "unique value"? [file]1417[/file]

[quote] Sukhanitsky Andrey Vladimirovich Integrator wrote: [quote] Those. Are you saying that emptiness is a "unique value"? [file]1417[/file] [/quote] that's right, here's the revision -dop-polya-produktov-protsessa/ [/quote] I am an ordinary person and for me "emptiness" is something that does not exist. Accordingly, there is no value in emptiness. There are two options here: 1. Bug in action work 2. Grammatically incorrect description of the action. Let me disagree with you that emptiness (in the generally accepted sense of it) is a "unique value".

[quote] Bogomaz Dmitry Vladimirovich Client wrote: I am an ordinary person and for me "emptiness" is something that does not exist. Accordingly, there is no value in emptiness. There are two options here: 1. Bug in action work 2. Grammatically incorrect description of the action. Let me disagree with you that emptiness (in the generally accepted sense of it) is a "unique value". [/quote] This is not a generally accepted rule, this is a specific TK from a client who paid money for this, here is a link with a description https://crm-onebox.com/ru/support/business-processes/3425-dorabotka-deystviya-quotdobavit-produkti-s -odnogo-protsessa-v-drugoyquot-gruppirovat-produkti-po-znacheniyam-dop-polya-produktov-protsessa/ If the function does not work as we would like, it does not mean that this is a bug, in this case there is a specific condition from the customer

[quote] Sukhanitsky Andrey Vladimirovich Integrator wrote: [quote] Bogomaz Dmitry Vladimirovich Client wrote: I am an ordinary person and for me "emptiness" is something that does not exist. Accordingly, there is no value in emptiness. There are two options here: 1. Bug in action work 2. Grammatically incorrect description of the action. Let me disagree with you that emptiness (in the generally accepted sense of it) is a "unique value". [/quote] This is not a generally accepted rule, this is a specific TK from a client who paid money for this, here is a link with a description https://crm-onebox.com/ru/support/business-processes/3425-dorabotka-deystviya-quotdobavit-produkti-s -odnogo-protsessa-v-drugoyquot-gruppirovat-produkti-po-znacheniyam-dop-polya-produktov-protsessa/ If the function does not work as we would like, it does not mean that this is a bug, in this case there is a specific condition from the customer [/quote] This is not a custom build. This feature is available to all users. Accordingly, it should be understandable to other users. If you think that the program works logically correctly, then so be it. I just tried to point out that an ordinary user of the program may have difficulties when setting it up.

[quote] Bogomaz Dmitry Vladimirovich Client wrote: This is not a custom build. This feature is available to all users. Accordingly, it should be understandable to other users. If you think that the program works logically correctly, then so be it. I just tried to point out that an ordinary user of the program may have difficulties when setting it up. [/quote] This revision would not have been available if it had not been ordered, you, as a user of the system, have the opportunity to use it or not to use it. Each user of the system has his own logic, each needs it differently, in this case the task was in this way, you do not need to add products without a value, but another user needs it, so he generated the appropriate request

[quote] Sukhanitsky Andrey Vladimirovich Integrator wrote: [quote] Bogomaz Dmitry Vladimirovich Client wrote: This is not a custom build. This feature is available to all users. Accordingly, it should be understandable to other users. If you think that the program works logically correctly, then so be it. I just tried to point out that an ordinary user of the program may have difficulties when setting it up. [/quote] This revision would not have been available if it had not been ordered, you, as a user of the system, have the opportunity to use it or not to use it. Each user of the system has his own logic, each needs it differently, in this case the task was in this way, you do not need to add products without a value, but another user needs it, so he generated the appropriate request [/quote] Everyone has the same logic - “formal logic”. In this case, it was broken. If a product is being made for general use, it will not be entirely correct to replace the meaning of the meaning of the Terms with arbitrary values without notifying users about it. Because users (myself in particular) can experience cognitive dissonance when they say “emptiness = unique value”.