OS - in comparison with other business management systems

[quote] Chizhik Alexander Sergeevich OneBox production Administrator wrote: There is no such table - you can compile it yourself by analyzing the system market - Google to help. [/quote] it's kind of a suggestion :) in this case, the question is from the partner to the vendor because to a large extent, many factors depend on the policy of the vendor and above all the opportunity to sell partners more of their services which directly affects the success of the brand itself and its promotion I personally run a youtube channel where I share my discoveries in the system https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCIEG2RBd9TO-rMDHA73Zwvw/videos I invite everyone to subscribe and support likes, comments, tips facebook page https://www.facebook.com/iCOLOR.OneBox/ finally I opened the OneBox school and there are first graduates https://icoloronebox.org/oneboxschool/ I promote basic business processes that are launched almost daily in 99% of companies https://icoloronebox.org/oneboxstart I have been leading the Entrepreneurs Club in telegram for a long time, where the number of subscribers is comparable to the OneBox channel itself;) https://t.me/icoloronebox well, on instagram I share my solutions and findings https://www.instagram.com/vyacheslav_legeza.icoloronebox/ I note that the number of subscribers is growing without financial investments, only due to my activity and the benefits that I bring in working with OneBox OS, primarily to its users because I share my experience and discoveries that are hidden in the depths of this excellent and advanced operating system, something like this and at the same time, I still have time to meet with clients and to configure the system for their complex and different business processes, which can be 20+, so that they also feel the benefit of their wonderful acquisition and do not try to go to other systems that are just crm -ki WITHOUT the opportunities that a well-CONNECTED OneBox provides a bare box or an empty cloud WITHOUT contacts, WITHOUT documents, WITHOUT USERS, somehow weakly pulls on a full-fledged business management system

and it looks like OneBox has one giant advantage over any other system I had to face some systems as a user this is what happened with Bitrix24, amoCRM, Planfix, Odoo and frankly, I note that none of them has the coolest BUSINESS PROCESSES - Workflow Application which simply tear apart all other systems with their organicity and narrowness of working with tasks. which are solved in such processes

[quote] Chizhik Alexander Sergeevich OneBox production Administrator wrote: There is no such table - you can compile it yourself by analyzing the system market - Google to help. [/quote] Hello! Join the dialogue. From my point of view, billing of individual applications worsens the work of integrators. For example Workflow. The billing of this application sets the task for the integrator to implement the project not as simply as possible (by building not complex BPs), but with the least number of BPs and, accordingly, the client will save (and this is an argument). customers will require the integrator to implement the project with the least number of BPs. Integrators with little experience will not be able to compete with large experienced integrators. Thus, strong players gain a competitive advantage.

Thank you, I'll send you an email today. The initial information is strictly for partners, but you can transform it for clients as you like.

[quote] Dmitry AIRConstruct wrote: [quote] Chizhik Alexander Sergeevich OneBox production Administrator wrote: There is no such table - you can compile it yourself by analyzing the system market - Google to help. [/quote] Hello! Join the dialogue. From my point of view, billing of individual applications worsens the work of integrators. For example Workflow. The billing of this application sets the task for the integrator to implement the project not as simply as possible (by building not complex BPs), but with the least number of BPs and, accordingly, the client will save (and this is an argument). customers will require the integrator to implement the project with the least number of BPs. Integrators with little experience will not be able to compete with large experienced integrators. Thus, strong players gain a competitive advantage. [/quote] The question is not even the number of business processes In fact, you can generally shove everything into one and it's not very difficult. And it’s quite possible to limit yourself to five, to distinguish them by name, fields / interfaces It is possible to pervert, but will it be convenient for users? As for me, this will simply nullify the mega advantage of OneBox, which I constantly repeat. The flexibility of this operating system in the multiplicity of processes and their combinations. A good process base allows you to expand your presence in different industries, often so different that it would be impossible to coexist so much in one system. But it is possible.