Refinement of history in processes
http://crm.mebelok.com
On the example of an order http://crm.mebelok.com/admin/customorder/realizatsiya-izdeliy/481830/edit/
Manager edited 1 field, clicked save, open history in progress
https://prnt.sc/w71pmg
A bunch of changes were recorded in the history, BUT all these changes on behalf of the manager, although the manager edited 1 field.
The bottom line is that procedures, actions at stages, etc. are performed. - all this is written in history as if the manager did it, but in fact these actions are written on behalf of the manager.
What we need:
1. To clearly write in history who made the changes. Example, if a manager edited 1 field, and actions/procedures were performed there, then write that they were not performed on behalf of the manager, but somehow mark that these are system changes. Write on behalf of the one who did it only what this employee actually did, and not what was automatically calculated there, etc.
2. Add an item to the filtering with a choice of process produc
Original question is available on version: ru
https://qube-soft.com/ crm erp onebox qubesoft внедрение аналитика 1с интегратор
On the example of an order http://crm.mebelok.com/admin/customorder/realizatsiya-izdeliy/481830/edit/
Manager edited 1 field, clicked save, open history in progress
https://prnt.sc/w71pmg
A bunch of changes were recorded in the history, BUT all these changes on behalf of the manager, although the manager edited 1 field.
The bottom line is that procedures, actions at stages, etc. are performed. - all this is written in history as if the manager did it, but in fact these actions are written on behalf of the manager.
What we need:
1. To clearly write in history who made the changes. Example, if a manager edited 1 field, and actions/procedures were performed there, then write that they were not performed on behalf of the manager, but somehow mark that these are system changes. Write on behalf of the one who did it only what this employee actually did, and not what was automatically calculated there, etc.
2. Add an item to the filtering with a choice of process produc
Answers:
Korop Vladislav Pavlovich wrote:
1. To clearly write in history who made the changes. Example, if a manager edited 1 field, and actions/procedures were performed there, then write that they were not performed on behalf of the manager, but somehow mark that these are system changes. Write on behalf of the one who did it only what this employee actually did, and not what was automatically calculated there, etc.
Well, as if now the logic is based on the fact that if the action was caused by the user, then he is written as the author of the change. Otherwise, you will compare who launched this or that saving action by clicking.
Well, this is not a small piece of work - everything needs to be refactored, because updates can be called in blocks and, accordingly, procedures / actions can be launched + 100% something will not be provided (because there are a lot of things connected) and we will redo / something more than once provide.
The task is not banal, just 50 hours of refactoring.
Korop Vladislav Pavlovich wrote:
2. Add an item to the filtering with a choice of process product fields and additional. process product fields so that you can filter by changes in the tabular section https://prnt.sc/vu5c77
You can already filter by field through input.
If purely for the sake of convenience - revision 4 hours.
22.12.2020, 16:20
Original comment available on version: ru
Please join the conversation. If you have something to say - please write a comment. You will need a mobile phone and an SMS code for identification to enter.
Log in and comment
Copyright © OneBox 2024
