Filter button not showing in report

[quote] Filter by creation date from 2021-01-01 [/quote] But how do you filter by it if there is not enough dedicated capacity on the server to render? it gives 504 I checked in several browsers on the date early - appears. Is the problem in a specific browser? How about in others?

[quote] Tyndyk Maxim Vadimovich wrote: [quote] Filter by creation date from 2021-01-01 [/quote] But how do you filter by it if there is not enough dedicated capacity on the server to render? it gives 504 I checked in several browsers on the date early - appears. Is the problem in a specific browser? How about in others? [/quote] My report opens, it filters everything, but when I try to filter, I choose some kind of filter, the Filter button itself does not appear I check on MacOS Chrome, the client on Windows is similar

It seems to me that all this is happening due to the large weight of the page, my tab freezes (I can’t do anything on the Win10 Chrome page at all), in such situations, javascript “hangs” and cannot process the script

In this case, if the problem is due to a large amount of data, you need to modify: We need to see processes that have additional. process field >0, more precisely the field Amount of fine Now we are grouping, but those processes that have no values are also displayed, we need to exclude such processes from the display / selection Can it be improved like this?

[quote] We need to see processes that have additional. process field >0, more precisely the field Amount of fine [/quote] What prevents you from displaying the filter by the additional field you need and filtering?

[quote] Tyndyk Maxim Vadimovich wrote: [quote] We need to see processes that have additional. process field >0, more precisely the field Amount of fine [/quote] What prevents you from displaying the filter by the additional field you need and filtering? [/quote] Because I can’t specify in the filter to display processes for which the amount of the fine is> 0 You can look here https://rozpakui.crm-onebox.com/admin/report/designer/31/view/

Well, actually, because you have a reference book there - that's where it pulls up the options. Alternatively, you can make a setting in the filter to ignore the fact that this is a directory - that is, display and filter only for binding to a type (in this case, an integer FROM and TO) - such a setting will take 2 hours.

[quote] Tyndyk Maxim Vadimovich wrote: Well, actually, because you have a reference book there - that's where it pulls up the options. Alternatively, you can make a setting in the filter to ignore the fact that this is a directory - that is, display and filter only for binding to a type (in this case, an integer FROM and TO) - such a setting will take 2 hours. [/quote] Filtering is again unnecessary actions, ideally so that unnecessary processes are not displayed immediately upon opening, because you have to constantly wait for a minute until it loads. It is advisable to make a setting in the block itself, taking into account only processes that have additional. process field > value (0 will be) and we will immediately exclude unnecessary processes, can this be done?

[quote] It is advisable to make a setting in the block itself, taking into account only processes that have additional. process field > value (0 will be) and we will immediately exclude unnecessary processes, can this be done? [/quote] Yes, that's possible. Single setting - 2 hours. Multiple setup - 3 hours

[quote] Tyndyk Maxim Vadimovich wrote: Single setting - 2 hours. Multiple setup - 3 hours [/quote] Is it possible to set conditions for the 1st field or 2 or more at the same time?