OS - Sort groups and BP

[quote] Tyndyk Maxim Vadimovich OneBox production wrote: What kind of sorting are you talking about? If about the list of PSU types https://ergo.crm-onebox.com/app/workflow/ - I don’t think that someone will do this if there is a search. [/quote] Yes, I'm talking about the list of PSU types. 1. The thing is that the search simplifies and reduces the time of working with processes. But at the same time, it would be much easier: to collapse groups, sort them directly on the processes page, be able to move bp from one group to another directly in the list, restore individual processes directly from the processes page. 2. Regarding sorting: This sorting works, as far as I know, in the whole system in the same way, and when creating new processes from any pages. In the list and groups of process types, it is logical to arrange processes in ascending order of importance, and not in alphabetical order as it is now (that is, to allow the user to sort processes). For example, I have a process group: "Inquiries and orders" group And the processes in it: - Requests - Orders And it is more important for us that 'Requests' be the first in the list, but it turns out to be the second in sorting. And if there are more processes in the group, then you have to add numbers or letters in front of the name, and it looks like I'm working on a system of the 90s ...

[quote] Tyndyk Maxim Vadimovich OneBox production wrote: I don't think this" would be something anyone would do if there was a search [/quote] Why do you think there are numbers in the titles? (See picture) I'm talking about manual sorting in this list. [file]9873[/file]

But what if you add a checkmark to the business process setting to organize a custom sequence The simplest solution to the problem is to add a numeric field to the process setting by which it will be sorted That is, this is similar to what is done in the stage settings, where by default it is sorted by name, and when the field is filled, then sorting occurs by it. So it will become much more convenient to work and allow you to abandon crutches with names. do in OS? How much do you appreciate any kind of work

I don't see any value! there is a quick search it helps to find immediately

[quote] Ustimenko Igor OneBox production Administrator OneBox CTO wrote: I don't see any value! there is a quick search it helps to find immediately [/quote] what is the search here. users need sorting of processes, by type of sorting of stages.

[file]9968[/file]

[file]9969[/file] I need easy sorting. For example, when creating, it is important for me that a certain process goes first.

it will take 4 hours to redo the sorting accounting throughout the system free finishes ended on 08/31/2021 - this was clearly indicated in the topic on free OS improvements. now we can take only improvements for 1-2 hours and only for the cloud and only what we consider useful

[quote] Ustimenko Igor OneBox production Administrator OneBox CTO wrote: it will take 4 hours to redo the sorting accounting throughout the system free finishes ended on 08/31/2021 - this was clearly indicated in the topic on free OS improvements. now we can take only improvements for 1-2 hours and only for the cloud and only what we consider useful [/quote] now all systems are trying to be as user-friendly as possible so that work can be done quickly and easily. Do you think that in 2021 it is normal for the user to write the names of BPs with numbers in front of them (such as 01.02. Name), precisely in order to have the correct sorting of BPs in groups? We are not talking about finishing, we need an initially convenient and well-thought-out system. Finished, this means that the system is not thought out and is in beta, if the user begins to invent some kind of crutches in order to COMFORTABLY work in the system.

[quote] Kornev Mikhail Client Ergo wrote: [quote] Ustimenko Igor OneBox production Administrator OneBox CTO wrote: it will take 4 hours to redo the sorting accounting throughout the system free finishes ended on 08/31/2021 - this was clearly indicated in the topic on free OS improvements. now we can take only improvements for 1-2 hours and only for the cloud and only what we consider useful [/quote] now all systems are trying to be as user-friendly as possible so that work can be done quickly and easily. Do you think that in 2021 it is normal for the user to write the names of BPs with numbers in front of them (such as 01.02. Name), precisely in order to have the correct sorting of BPs in groups? We are not talking about finishing, we need an initially convenient and well-thought-out system. Finished, this means that the system is not thought out and is in beta, if the user begins to invent some kind of crutches in order to COMFORTABLY work in the system. [/quote] and I think the moment is thought out and besides you and Legeza, no one is engaged in such nonsense and no one asked for this, so this is purely your Wishlist. If you think that now write in the Legeza chat to vote here and put the pros "do it" - then this will not work

[quote] Ustimenko Igor OneBox production Administrator OneBox CTO wrote: If you think that now write in the Legeza chat to vote here and put the pros "do it" - then this will not work [/quote] Is that what you think)) and I just asked there if anyone has a similar problem. in fact, not many users think about whether it is convenient for them to work and what can be improved. they're just trying to do something with what's already there. for them you should think in theory, but you are busy with something else)) [quote] Ustimenko Igor OneBox production Administrator OneBox CTO wrote: and I think the moment is thought out and besides you and Legeza, no one is engaged in such nonsense and no one asked for this, so this is purely your Wishlist. [/quote] anyway, you will implement this "nonsense", sooner or later, I'm sure of it))) van box is in a sense "limited" by thoughts like this, that's why it is what it is. the world has long had standards that are followed for simplicity and convenience, nothing needs to be invented. it's purely about UX/UI. Well, there it is up to you to decide where and how to develop, here we all depend on your decisions. so all hope is on you!

I'll close the thread. this difficult task has not yet been solved

[quote] Kornev Mikhail Client Ergo wrote: I'll close the thread. this difficult task has not yet been solved [/quote] will be this week

added update on monday

[quote] Ustimenko Igor OneBox production Administrator OneBox CTO wrote: added update on monday [/quote] It is interesting how the solution is implemented. Looking forward to Monday.